ON CUBA: REAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN OBAMA, CLINTON...
John Nichols
It is often suggested that there is not much difference between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton when it comes to the stands they have taken as senators. And on the question of how the U.S. relates to Cuba – an issue that has suddenly moved to the forefront with the news that Fidel Castro is stepping down as the leader of the Caribbean nation – the candidates can sound similar.
When word came of Castro's move, Obama said the Cuban president's decision to hand power to his younger brother "should mark the end of a dark era in Cuba's history. ... Fidel Castro's stepping down is an essential first step, but it is sadly insufficient in bringing freedom to Cuba."
Clinton said, "The United States must pursue an active policy that does everything possible to advance the cause of freedom, democracy and opportunity in Cuba."
That's reasonably standard language for presidential candidates talking about Cuba.
But this is a case where the records behind the words really do tell different stories.
During their shared tenure in the Senate, and over the course of the current campaign, Obama and Clinton have taken different stands and sent distinct signals.
They have even voted differently on an issue that has provided a regular test of congressional sentiments regarding U.S. policy toward Cuba.
more...
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/campaignmatters?pid=287406