Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FISA isn’t the worst of it

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
SusanLarson Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:44 PM
Original message
FISA isn’t the worst of it
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 04:08 PM by SusanLarson
Source: Clarksville Online

FISA is just the latest salvo in an attempt to install a surveillance society in America. Don’t let anger at the Bush administration and Fear Uncertainty and Doubt (FUD) over the NSA blind you to a much larger problem. We need a comprehensive national policy on data collection and its use in both the public & private sectors. Privacy rights and the associated laws must be clarified and strengthened, taking into account the complexities of modern technologies. The wall between government and private industry must also be restored.

Theoretically, U.S. laws and policies restrict the government’s use of dossiers on individual citizens who are not under criminal investigation. President Carter’s Executive order 12036 prohibited domestic surveillance. There are no such laws preventing private companies from doing so, as long as they ensure that specific protected pieces of data (your social security number, for example) aren’t lost or stolen or otherwise compromised. And some people in the intelligence community have been trying to get their hands on that commercial data for years.

Read more: http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2008/02/25/fisa-isnt-the-worst-of-it/



Datamining is evil, it does not matter if it's done by the government or private industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, I've been sitting on an idea that would allow
for a huge increase in surveillance without a major investment in equipment or changing any laws.

I'm afraid to even patent it because someone would actually read the patent application and implement it.

I thought of it as a possible way to track kidnappers in case of an Amber alert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. who's the editor of that paper?
" its use in bonth the public & private sectors" - in bonth??

*psst* to susan: it's datamining dear.

i'm really trying not to be a bitch today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SusanLarson Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. leQ
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 03:59 PM by SusanLarson
They fixed that already thanks though. Fixed the mining. I have a friend in the hospital and somewhat distracted...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Welcome to DU, Susan!
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 04:20 PM by Karenina
And thank you for this EXCELLENT post!!! :toast: It's clear, concise and comprehensive. K&R!!!

Sending good vibes to you and your friend from across the Big Pond! :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. (sarcasm) Oh yeah, orgs. have been SO effective protecting SSNs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. EXACTAMUNDO! Can we get a 5th rec here?
Bitte?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. welcome to DU Susan! Excellent post!
Thoughts and prayers for your hospitalized friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
8. The criminals in the White House say it is justified because we
are at war. Well, number one, we are not 'at war'. We are Occupying another country. Number two, terrorism is a tactic used by criminals not an enemy. We are in Iraq because of a lie. These programs are being implemented because of lies! What a fascist state this nation has become. I am sad for my country and the people that have to suffer because of the criminals in our precious White House. :dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC