Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Middle East Times EDITORIAL: Déjà vu all over again on Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 01:04 PM
Original message
Middle East Times EDITORIAL: Déjà vu all over again on Iraq
EDITORIAL: Déjà vu all over again on Iraq
Published: March 19, 2008TOOLBAR

Two news reports Wednesday document the Bush administration's unfortunate continued blindness, one might even call it delusional thinking, on Iraq.

First, U.S. President George W. Bush once again defended the war, saying it was necessary to topple Saddam Hussein. Speaking at the Pentagon, Bush was unapologetic while commemorating the fifth anniversary of the beginning of the U.S. invasion of Iraq. He once again maintained that "removing Saddam Hussein from power was the right decision.".

Bush then repeated his recent mantra that the "surge" in U.S. troop levels and the new -- certainly more effective -- counter-insurgency policy pursued over the past 14 months by U.S. Gen. David Petraeus had already achieved "a major strategic victory in the broader war on terror".

That same day, however the British Broadcasting Corporation suggested a far different reality. The BBC reported that the death toll from Monday's terror bombing in the Iraqi city of Karbala had reached 52. Another 75 people were injured in the explosion, which occurred as U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney was on a tour of the country.

more:http://www.metimes.com/Editorial/2008/03/19/editorial_dj_vu_all_over_again_on_iraq/8227/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Have I missed something? Did Bush ever say that the reason for
going to war was to depose Saddam? I mean 5-6 years ago, when he was setting us up for the invasion. Hasn't that been a more recent, convenient rationale? After all, getting Saddam is about the only thing that has been successful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC