NYT editorial: National Parks in Peril

[DeepModem Mom]

Editorial
Parks in Peril
Published: March 24, 2008

....Two weeks ago, the antiregulatory brigade in the Office of Management and Budget killed ozone standards that would have offered stronger protections for plants, trees, crops and wildlife. And the Environmental Protection Agency, ignoring protests from its own regional offices and the National Park Service, is nearing approval of regulations that would make it easier to build coal-fired plants near parks and wilderness areas without installing pollution controls.

Improving the national parks was one of President Bush’s two big environmental promises in the 2000 campaign. The other was his pledge to control greenhouse gas emissions, abandoned the day he rejected the Kyoto Protocol on climate change. As for the parks, Mr. Bush has commendably increased their budgets and started a separate centennial campaign to encourage private contributions on an unprecedented scale. Unfortunately, his enthusiasm for cleaner air in the parks is not nearly as strong as his fealty to the utilities.

In 2003, for instance, his proposal for revising the Clean Air Act, known as Clear Skies, would have stifled dissent by making it harder for the Park Service and other agencies to object to new power plants. In 2005, an otherwise admirable E.P.A. plan to reduce power plant pollution east of the Mississippi, known as the Clean Air Interstate Rule, also provided cover for many of the dirtiest plants to avoid expensive pollution controls. And in 2006, the White House weakened a proposed rule that would have greatly reduced the airborne particulates that ruin the scenic views in many parks.

The net result is that one in three national parks suffers from one or another form of air pollution, including immensely popular destinations like Yosemite in California, Great Smoky Mountain, straddling the Tennessee-North Carolina border, and Gettysburg.

The air in these parks will only get worse if the administration proceeds with its latest rules opening the way for more downwind power plants. Members of Congress and nearly every environmental organization have asked Mr. Bush to abandon this ruinous idea. Doing so would improve not only the parks but also whatever positive legacy Mr. Bush hopes to leave behind.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/24/opinion/24mon1.html

[doodadem]

1. Ancient tree damage

We live right down the road from Kings Canyon and Sequoia National Parks in eastern Calif. Studies over the past few years are showing the ancient redwoods there at 5,000+ foot elevation are showing signs of pollution damage drifting up from the San Joaquin Valley, home of big industrial agriculture.

We moved here to our farm several years ago, hoping for clean mountain air at 2,000 feet elevation. My chronic bronchitis is far worse here than it ever was in putrid Cincinnati. "Valley Fever", a chronic lung ailment is rampant here, as is asthma.

[DeepModem Mom]

2. Thanks for sharing your real-life experience, doodadem. Bad stuff. nt