Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Military agreement ignored by media

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 02:39 PM
Original message
Military agreement ignored by media
http://www.yumasun.com/opinion/forces_40617___article.html/one_armed.html/p



It is very troubling to me that in a ceremony that received virtually no attention in the American media, the United States and Canada signed a military agreement Feb. 14 allowing the armed forces from one nation to support the armed forces of the other nation during a domestic civil emergency, even one that does not involve a cross-border crisis.

The agreement, defined as a Civil Assistance Plan, was not submitted to Congress for approval, nor did Congress pass any law or treaty specifically authorizing this military agreement to combine the operations of the armed forces of the United States and Canada in the event of a wide range of domestic civil disturbances ranging from violent storms to civil riots...The military Civil Assistance Plan can be seen as a further incremental step being taken toward creating a North American armed forces available to be deployed in domestic North American emergency situations and in my mind civil unrest when they implement the North American Union. They are fully aware the peoples of all of these nations will not accept it without rioting in the streets. It is not just American citizens who do not want this merger but citizens from all three countries.

In May 2007, President Bush, on his own authority, signed National Security Presidential Directive 51, also known as Homeland Security Presidential Directive 20, authorizing the president to declare a national emergency and take over all functions of federal, state, local, territorial and tribal governments, without necessarily obtaining the approval of Congress to do so. So here he goes again bypassing Congress and the people in his quest for complete unheard of power in this United States.

If the establishment was really supportive of protecting U.S. national sovereignty why on earth would they allow this agreement? There is no question that the U.S. government is preparing for martial law domestically, but the long-term goal is to establish a martial law apparatus for all of North America. They are merely beginning the implementation of what has been announced in the Vision 2020 document. There is little question that this deal between the U.S. and Canadian military is another step toward forming a North American Union that is ruled by a militarized police state.


--
BRIAN O'FARRELL
Yuma
A letter to the Editor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here's what I've found on it...
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 03:06 PM by IanDB1
Results 1 - 7 of 7 for Civil-Assistance-Plan canada. (0.07 seconds)
http://news.google.com/news?sourceid=navclient-ff&rlz=1B3GGGL_enUS212US212&um=1&tab=wn&hl=en&q=%22Civil+Assistance+Plan%22+canada&btnG=Search+News



Military agreement ignored by media
Yuma Sun, AZ - Mar 26, 2008
... and Canada in the event of a wide range of domestic civil disturbances ranging from violent storms to civil riots. The military Civil Assistance Plan ...



The Deployment of US Troops inside Canada
Center for Research on Globalization, Canada - Mar 13, 2008
Marc Dumais, commander of Canada Command, have signed a Civil Assistance Plan that allows the military from one nation to support the armed forces of the ...
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8323



‘Deeply disturbed’ by actions of the president
The Torrington Telegram, WY - Mar 5, 2008
14, President Bush, without the approval of Congress, entered into an agreement with Canada called, innocuously enough, the “Civil Assistance Plan. ...
http://www.torringtontelegram.com/V2_news_articles.php?heading=0&page=&story_id=1617


News briefs
The Republic, Canada - Feb 29, 2008
In fact, the term “Civil Assistance Plan” does not occur anywhere in the entire government of Canada website. The only known official mention of it is in a ...
http://www.republic-news.org/archive/183-repub/183_briefs.html


ANOTHER STEP FORWARD?
Marconews (subscription), FL - Mar 2, 2008
... commander of USNORTHCOM, signs the Civil Assistance Plan (CAP) with Canadian Air Force Lieutenant General Marc Dumais, commander of Canada Command, ...
http://www.naplesnews.com/blogs/observation_post/2008/mar/02/naumilitaryentry/


Letter: Giving up sovereignty?
Topeka Capital Journal (subscription), KS - Mar 15, 2008
14, the US signed a Civil Assistance Plan with Canada "that allows the military from one nation to support the armed forces of the other nation during a ...
http://www.cjonline.com/stories/031608/opi_258304830.shtml


When Did We Become the Enemy?
OpEdNews, PA - Mar 3, 2008
And just this last week, General Renaurt AF, signed the Civil Assistance Plan with Canada that will allow the Canadian Military to be used against us on our ...
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_marti_oa_080302_when_did_we_become_t.htm


Also, here on DU:

Canada, U.S. quietly sign mutual military aid pact - Democratic ...
Feb 25, 2008 ... the armed forces of the other nation during a civil emergency. ...... Bush has been destroying our military. What about yours Canada? ...
www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3196809
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3196809


Canada, U.S. agree to use each other's troops in civil emergencies ...
Feb 24, 2008 ... Canada, US agree to use each other's troops in civil emergencies. ... of Canada Command, signed the plan, which allows the military from one ...
www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2915905


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. May I Call on You for Research? Fabulous Job!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. All I did was Google. There wasn't much there in the news.
Of course, there's more out there on the blogs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC