Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Projection: Clinton Wins the Popular Vote!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 05:03 AM
Original message
Projection: Clinton Wins the Popular Vote!
http://www.usnews.com/blogs/barone/2008/3/28/projection-clinton-wins-popular-vote-obama-wins-delegate-count.html

"The Obama campaign has argued on occasion that its primary or caucus victories in Republican states means that Obama has a better chance to carry them in the general election than Clinton. As the Clinton people point out, that's ridiculous in some cases: No one thinks Obama's victories in lightly attended caucuses in Idaho or Wyoming mean that he can win them in November. Even in states like Minnesota and Colorado, Obama's caucus wins are less persuasive evidence than current polls that he can do better there than Clinton in November. Nor are Clinton's primary victories in states like Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, and Ohio very strong evidence for the proposition that she'd be stronger than Obama. General election polls are better evidence; they buttress Clinton's case in New Jersey and Ohio, and refute it for Nevada, New Hampshire, and New Mexico. Interestingly, Clinton won primaries in only five states which went heavily for George W. Bush in 2000 and 2004—Arizona, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Texas."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BearSquirrel2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 05:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hillary gets em out to vote ...

Conservatives that is. Right now she's getting poll dittoheads voting in the Democratic primary. In the general election, she'll get fundamentalists out to vote against her despite their apathy for John McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Interesting statement but full of non-logic
Especially seeing Obama winning the Republican vote in most states. And, come GE these same Republicans will be loyal to party faithful. Unless you have statistics showing Obama republicans will cross-over in the GE whereas Hillary republicans will vote party line your post is irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BearSquirrel2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. Those people who voted for Romney and Huckabee ...

Those folks who voted for Romney and Huckabee, they're unlikely to vote for McCain. They know darn well the man is a flip-flopper and not "one of them". If just 10% of those folks decide not to vote, that's it for John McCain, the Democratic candidate will win. Take those same people and put Hillary Clinton on the ticket ... well they have so much old hostility for the Clintons they will show up just to vote against her. That and Hillary has a very polarizing effect even on political moderates.

It's the McCain voters who are crossing lines to vote for Hillary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kmsarvis Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. GOOD POINT BEARSQUIRREL2!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hillary gets them out to vote....the reliable older voters, especially. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qanisqineq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. As much as I would love to see it
Just because Obama won these really red states in the primaries does not mean they will turn blue in the GE. The voter turnout for North Dakota democrats was huge compared to the republicans. But I have little doubt that it will go red for the GE in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. Golly, What did Bill say about Texas?

Noted from the above "projection":

It should be noted that the winner-take-all score would have been reversed if Clinton had lost Texas, which she carried by the narrow margin of 51 percent to 47 percent and which has 193 delegates.


Who won Texas again?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Considering Hillary won the popular vote
This is a better indicator of whom will carry the state in the GE as compared to a caucus. So your post is flawed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Considering who will actually win the delegates, my post is definitely not flawed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. as is yours. head-to-heads with mcCain are my preferred indicator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Gramma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Unlikely in the extreme that Texas will go blue
regardless of which candidate we run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. To say that Obama won Texas is like saying Bush won the 2000 election.
The fact is that more Texans voted for Hillary than for Obama.

As a democrat, I would have to conclude that Hillary won Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. You obviously don't understand the Texas process then.
Edited on Mon Mar-31-08 08:26 AM by JTFrog
No matter how many republicans voted for our candidates, the fact remains that Texas IS Obama country.

If I recall Texas has a multi-step process that accounts for things like that.

Hillary left a nasty taste in everyone's mouth in Texas. I've read accounts of her own precinct captains walking out in disgust saying they couldn't in good faith support her any longer.

As a democrat, I'd have to conclude that the State sanctioned results will show that Obama won Texas handily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. If the Texas process is so great, why are they the only state to use it?
Are you saying that all the States that hold regular one-person-one-vote primaries are less democratic than Texas? :eyes:

I would put the suggestion to you that the Texas system, rather than being supercool and totally smart, is in fact fundamentally flawed and undemocratic - because it enables the candidate who lost the primary to claw-back delegates through the caucuses.

But if I am wrong and the Texas system is so frikkin' fantastic - maybe ALL the States should choose their delegates the same way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Why would you put it to me? I'm not a Texan. That's for them to decide.
It is what it is.

I think the entire process of a 600 day campaign with votes spread out over six months is the most ridiculous primary this country has had to endure to date. And now that I'm more involved in my own state, I'll be bringing that up time and time again.

In the meantime. It is what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IowaGirl Donating Member (539 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Some girl on an ABC blog was claiming that the Obama workers in Texas were
doing some weird things like calling Hillary supporters and telling them precincts had closed early, etc. I'm curious whether anyone else had heard anything like that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
13. Yup that's projection all right...
Please look the term up in the nearest psychology textbook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kmsarvis Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
17. CLINTON MAY WIN THE POPULAR VOTE IN TEXAS BUT.......
Edited on Mon Mar-31-08 12:10 PM by kmsarvis
SHE WILL MOST LIKELY LOSE THE POPULAR VOTE NATIONALY, EVEN IF FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN ARE COUNTED AS IS.

Popular Vote (w/FL & MI)** 13,931,651 47.6% 13,837,470 47.2% Obama +94,181 +0.4%

Estimate w/IA, NV, ME, WA* 14,265,735 47.6% 14,061,332 47.0% Obama +204,403 +0.6%

WITH MICHIGAN AND FLORIDA COUNTED AS IS OBAMA STILL LEADS IN THE POPULAR VOTE BY 204,403. WHAT EVER SHE GAINS IN PA SHE IS LIKELY TO LOSE IN NC.
ALTHOUGH CLINTON IS LIKELY TO WIN KENTUCKY ,WEST VIRGINIA AND PUERTO RICO, OBAMA IS STILL AHEAD IN THE INDIANA POLLS AND WILL PROBABLY WIN OREGON BY A SIGNIFICANT MARGIN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychmommy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
19. boy, that stuff you guys are smoking is incredible.
pass some of that over here!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
20. Popular Vote?
Maybe. But Hillary LOST the election.

What is the prize for 2nd Place?
Is there a trophy or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. What election?
I thought we were still nominating.

The election will have to be won against Mr. McCain, last I looked. And the real question is... how will the electoral college shake out for Dems in the fall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlacivita Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
21. The idea that winning a state by a few percentage points means your opponent can't win it
in the general is just silly.

We're talking about a fraction of the total voter population slightly favoring either hillary or obama.

There's no doubt that whoever the nominee is, democrats will win CA and NY, for example, so this whole line of thinking is flawed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC