Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Obama's Support Softening in the Polls

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:13 AM
Original message
NYT: Obama's Support Softening in the Polls
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/04/us/politics/04campaign.html?adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1207303741-HZbq8SrhhkwWeFveHZmnwA

"Mr. Obama’s lead among men has disappeared during that period. In February, 67 percent of men wanted the party to nominate him compared with 28 percent for Mrs. Clinton. Now 47 percent back him, compared with 42 percent for her, a difference within the poll’s margin of error. Similarly, his lead has shrunk among whites, voters making more than $50,000 annually and voters under age 45."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. But....but....but...he's the Anointed One! There can be NO 'slippage!'
Or softening!!! It cannot BEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE...........

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flor de jasmim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. On the other hand, Obama had about 1/4 MILLION new contributors in March--
go figure!

The MSM has a vested interest in the primaries continuing for as long as possible, so unless they provide convincing sampling techniques, their reliability is a bit suspect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. nice editing
Edited on Fri Apr-04-08 05:27 AM by Syrinx
The paragraphs following your snip:

Mr. Obama’s favorability rating among Democratic primary voters has dropped seven percentage points, to 62 percent, since the last Times/CBS News survey, in late February. While that figure is by any measure high, the decline came in a month during which he endured withering attacks from Mrs. Clinton and responded to reports that his former pastor had made politically inflammatory statements from his church’s pulpit in Chicago.

Still, the events of the last month do not appear to have fundamentally altered the race for the party’s nomination or provided what Mrs. Clinton’s campaign has been seeking: evidence of a collapse in Mr. Obama’s standing or an overwhelming preference voiced for Mrs. Clinton by Democratic voters in polls, developments that could be used to persuade uncommitted superdelegates to sign on with her.

The poll showed that Mr. Obama now leads Senator John McCain of Arizona, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, 47 percent to 42 percent; his lead was 50 percent to 38 percent in late February, when Mr. McCain still faced primary opposition from Mike Huckabee. The latest poll shows Mrs. Clinton leading Mr. McCain, 48 percent to 43 percent, in a similar match-up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. What's truly funny is...
that these Clinton supporters seem to think their selective vision will alter the truth.
And the truth is Hilary is losing, she's been losing for quite a while now and
it really does not look like there is any likelihood that she can possibly win at all.

Yet with a some cut and paste their little world seems so much more in their favor.
Sorry Hillary fans, the only one's you're fooling are yourselves. But please continue.
It's so entertaining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yet another Nagourney piece
Edited on Fri Apr-04-08 05:24 AM by depakid
I sometimes wonder why this guy gets drug out from time to time, even though he's so transparent that no thinking person grants him credibility.

Why does the Times (Sulzberger the younger) do that?

I reckon maybe it's a Judith Miller thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flor de jasmim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Maybe it's cuz you can "fool some people all the time..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC