Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Joseph Stiglitz: A Deficit of Leadership

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 02:09 PM
Original message
Joseph Stiglitz: A Deficit of Leadership
A Deficit of Leadership
The greatest onus is on the Bush administration and the Fed. But can we trust those who got it so wrong to put things right?
by Joseph Stiglitz


The financial crisis being felt around the world will get worse - unless strong actions are taken by governments. The strongest action of all is required in the United States, where this global maelstrom originates.

Part of America’s economic problem today is a crisis in confidence - in its central bank, the Federal Reserve, in the regulators, in the Bush administration, in the political process. The way the crisis arose, and the way it has been handled, has provided ample reason for that lack of confidence. Bravado statements that everything is fine, followed by unprecedented and non-transparent bailouts and precipitous decreases in interest rates, has led to confidence in the Fed and the administration plummeting, as has confidence in America’s banks and their ability to manage risk.

The admission by Bush’s treasury that there is a need for regulation may at first seem refreshing, coming after steadfast insistence that these markets are self-regulating and must not be tampered with. But the fact that a core feature of the plan is to give the Fed — the very agency responsible for many of these problems — more oversight is hardly reassuring. It didn’t use what -powers it had to prevent the crisis; what -assurance is there that with more -”oversight” it will do any better?

Underlying the US’s financial woes are three distinct but related problems. First, a debt crisis, exemplified by sub-prime mortgages, with millions of Americans with mortgages greater than the value of their house.

Second, with so many bad debts, and such uncertainty about their magnitude, there is a credit crunch. Banks don’t even know the extent of their own problems; how then can they have much confidence in lending to others? It is not, however, just a problem of -illiquidity; it is deeper than that — -balance sheets have been badly hurt, and will have to somehow be repaired.

The third problem is macro-economic. The US has been sustained by a housing bubble, leading to a consumer binge. Household savings rates have fallen to zero. The Iraq war - and the soaring oil prices accompanying it - has depressed the economy. Money spent on oil or on Nepalese contractors in Iraq is money that isn’t being spent at home; these dollars don’t provide much stimulation for the economy.

more...

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/04/08/8151/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. It is not simply a crisis in confidence.
The money over the past decade has been spent in sub prime mortgage messes, and even further by rampant speculation on derivatives.

The mortgage crisis death toll tally is 8 to 10 trillion dollars.

The derivative losses could go as high as 517 Trillion dollars. Given that our yearly economy only garners about 13 to 16 trillion dollars (depending on how much last year's Humboldt crop is valued at) we are in for a rough ride.

All these monies have been wiped off the boards at the casino called Wall Street.

The investers played this money, putting it all on red 54 and black 17.

The wheel was spun, and they lost big time. They knew the loss ws coming - thye jsut didn't know if it was gonna occur in 2008 or 2018.

When the house takes the gambler's chip pile, it is not abt a loss of confidence. It is about a real and actual monetary loss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. While the housing crisis is hurting the economy
and that can be traced to bush's easing of loan restrictions, to me the NUMBER ONE problem, the biggest issue is the war. Above and beyond the price of gas, or the rise in consumer prices, are the people who are dying. When your house is blown up and your family is killed, who cares about the cost of a new sofa! End the war. First do that, then work on our economy. It just seems so effing selfish that Americans view the economy as issue number one. My God! Besides the fact that ending the war is morally correct, it will help our economy immeasureably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. This writer is also very concerned about the war; He has
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC