Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

As Petraeus Testifies: How Press Helped Bring Him the 'Surge'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 03:16 PM
Original message
As Petraeus Testifies: How Press Helped Bring Him the 'Surge'
Editor&Publisher: As Petraeus Testifies: How Press Helped Bring Him the 'Surge'
By Greg Mitchell

(April 08, 2008) -- With Gen. David Petraeus testifying before Congress today, it is worth pointing out that the media, just as in the run-up to the war, is complicit in the current "surge" debacle. Back in early January 2007, I labeled the press "surge protectors," calling the media's performance in the days before President Bush announced the surge their single greatest failing since the war began. More than a year later, with the "surge" at best a mixed success, and few troops brought home so far, that judgment appears even more accurate....

***

As this critical turning point in the Iraq war neared, the editorial pages of the largest U.S. newspapers were surprisingly -- even appallingly -- silent on President Bush's likely decision to send thousands of more troops to the country. It followed a long pattern, however, of opinion writers and TV talking heads strongly criticizing the conduct of the war -- without advocating a major change in direction....

***

This failure of will came even after liberal bloggers led the way, as a call went forth: Henceforth ye shall purge the "surge" from your vocabularies and laptops and replace it with "escalation" -- with all its echoes of Vietnam and, incidentally, accuracy regarding the situation. Almost no one took them up on their demand. Of course, escalation was the correct term -- who ever heard of a "surge" of any sort that would last more than a year?

...the best The New York Times could do, before the announcement, was an editorial expressing skepticism -- but declaring that Bush deserved "one last opportunity" to get Iraq right. One had to wonder: Why? After Bush made his speech, the Times and many others in the media thundered that Bush had not made the case for the plan.

But by then it was, tragically, too late.

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/columns/pressingissues_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003786843
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's true
This could never have happened without help from the press.

Even more frustrating is that the press is STILL failing to ask the relevant questions: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=103&topic_id=351431&mesg_id=351431
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC