Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Military Crisis in South America: The Results of Plan Colombia

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 06:54 PM
Original message
Military Crisis in South America: The Results of Plan Colombia
The military operative executed by Colombian soldiers on Ecuadorian soil to kill the FARC commander Raul Reyes is part of the strategy of the United States to alter the military balance in the region. In the crosshairs is Venezuelan and Ecuadorian oil; however it also serves as a check on Brazil as an emerging regional power.

What we are witnessing could be the first phase of a vast offensive to destabilize the "Bolivarian Revolution" and to alter the relationship between the powers in South America. This strategy has been implemented in stages. First there was Plan Colombia, intended to strengthen the military capacity of the Colombian state and place it among the most powerful on the continent. Next came the "spilling over" of the internal war into neighboring countries. The third stage seems to be "pre-emptive war," which has become the Pentagon's most widely used military strategy since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

This is the first time in a long time that Washington has taken the offensive in the region, and it is capable of putting a significant portion of Latin American countries behind its strategy.

. . .

In 2003, sociologist James Petras pointed out that the main worry of the U.S. Southern Command, who is the real architect behind regional politics, is that "Colombia's neighbors (Ecuador, Venezuela, Panama, Brazil), who are suffering the same adverse effects of neoliberal politics, shift politically against the military domination and the economic interests of the United States."6 This is why the strategy thought up for Plan Colombia does not consist so much in winning the internal war as it does in spilling it over into neighboring countries as a form of neutralizing their growing autonomy from Washington. Militarizing the relationships between nations is always a good business for whoever supports the hegemony with military superiority. In this sense, the FARC play a functional role in Washington's war plans.

more . . .
http://upsidedownworld.org/main/content/view/1206/68/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. KICK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Four hundred armed men at the beck and call
of Uribe is very disturbing. Colombia has one of the biggest armed forces in the world and THE biggest in Latin America.

That fact astounds me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. As long as the war mongers are in the saddle
no nation is safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amihol Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. consequences?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mqbush Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. Argentinians in the 1990s had to barter for goods and
services, as the currency had collapsed, the direct result of IMF's mugging. Washington likes Central and South American countries beaten down so they pose less of a "threat" to US dominance. In 1954, we overthrew a thriving populist democracy in Guatemala, because it was bringing that country out of grinding poverty. Chile, 1973. Oh, you know the list. I'd like to see the day that the US becomes a good neighbor in the world community, but that likely won't happen for another 50 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC