Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama, small towns, and ‘molehill politics’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 02:49 PM
Original message
Obama, small towns, and ‘molehill politics’
Edited on Sun Apr-13-08 02:50 PM by babylonsister
Obama, small towns, and ‘molehill politics’
Posted April 13th, 2008

snip//

Days before the controversy broke, Elizabeth Drew presciently noted the significance this year of “molehill politics,” which she described as “making a very big deal in the press about something that’s a very small deal.” Drew argued that the Clinton campaign has mastered molehill politics, “pounc(ing) on whatever opportunity presents itself to attack Obama, and try to knock him off his own message, and his stride.”

I can’t help but feel like this “bitter” flap is playing molehill politics to the extreme.

I’ve seen several comparisons between this flap and the controversy surrounding his former pastor, Jeremiah Wright. I think that’s probably the wrong analogy. This story reminds me far more of the “party of ideas” flap from January.

Remember that one? Obama gave an interview with a Nevada newspaper in which he said Reagan and JFK, during their respective eras, put the nation on a “fundamentally different path because the country was ready for it.” He added, “The Republican approach I think has played itself out. I think it’s fair to say the Republicans were the party of ideas for a pretty long chunk of time over the last 10 or 15 years, in the sense that they were challenging conventional wisdom. Now, you’ve heard it all before. You look at the economic policies, when they’re being debated among the presidential candidates, it’s all tax cuts. Well, we’ve done that, we’ve tried it.”

Obama’s critics pounced, saying he preferred Republican ideas to Democratic ideas, and had an affinity for Reagan’s conservative worldview. Bill Clinton announced at one rally, “(Hillary’s) principal opponent said that since 1992, the Republicans have had all the good ideas. I’m not making this up, folks.”

The “controversy” hung around for a few days, but it was based on transparent intellectual dishonesty. Everyone knew what Obama said and meant, but by distorting the comments, and adding a few words that Obama never uttered, his detractors manufactured a controversy, ascribing beliefs to the senator that he didn’t embrace.

I feel like something similar is happening here. In the hopes of making Obama unelectable, Clinton and Republicans insist that he must hate working families and small towns. We’ve reached the very odd point at which the Clinton campaign is distributing talking points from Grover Norquist and Ed Rollins.

more...

http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/15195.html#more-15195
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
travelingtypist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. And it's all happening with the happy cheerleading of
Russert-ho and his happy band. The Sunday talk shows today were nearly unwatchable for all of the "Gore invented the Internet" flasbacks I was having.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I was thinking earlier about..
how winners are now losers. Al Gore 'won' in 2000, but then 'lost. John Kerry 'won' in 2004, but then 'lost'. And Hillary agrees! There seems to be patterns here. I recall John Kerry windsurfing, and the endless commentary of his preference of drinking green tea. Such truly important issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. K & R AND a "C"
for chart!



It's not working, I think only because its so completely patronizing to the lowest common denominator, and.. um... well calling it like I see it... RETARDED.

Nice post !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC