Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Pentagon Strangles Our Economy:Why the U.S. Has Gone Broke By Chalmers Johnson

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:30 AM
Original message
The Pentagon Strangles Our Economy:Why the U.S. Has Gone Broke By Chalmers Johnson
http://mondediplo.com/2008/02/05military


26/04/08 " Le Monde " -- The military adventurers in the Bush administration have much in common with the corporate leaders of the defunct energy company Enron. Both groups thought that they were the "smartest guys in the room" -- the title of Alex Gibney's prize-winning film on what went wrong at Enron. The neoconservatives in the White House and the Pentagon outsmarted themselves. They failed even to address the problem of how to finance their schemes of imperialist wars and global domination.

As a result, going into 2008, the United States finds itself in the anomalous position of being unable to pay for its own elevated living standards or its wasteful, overly large military establishment. Its government no longer even attempts to reduce the ruinous expenses of maintaining huge standing armies, replacing the equipment that seven years of wars have destroyed or worn out, or preparing for a war in outer space against unknown adversaries. Instead, the Bush administration puts off these costs for future generations to pay or repudiate. This fiscal irresponsibility has been disguised through many manipulative financial schemes (causing poorer countries to lend us unprecedented sums of money), but the time of reckoning is fast approaching.

There are three broad aspects to the U.S. debt crisis. First, in the current fiscal year (2008) we are spending insane amounts of money on "defense" projects that bear no relation to the national security of the U.S. We are also keeping the income tax burdens on the richest segment of the population at strikingly low levels.

Second, we continue to believe that we can compensate for the accelerating erosion of our base and our loss of jobs to foreign countries through massive military expenditures -- "military Keynesianism" (which I discuss in detail in my book Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic). By that, I mean the mistaken belief that public policies focused on frequent wars, huge expenditures on weapons and munitions, and large standing armies can indefinitely sustain a wealthy capitalist economy. The opposite is actually true.

Third, in our devotion to militarism (despite our limited resources), we are failing to invest in our social infrastructure and other requirements for the long-term health of the U.S. These are what economists call opportunity costs, things not done because we spent our money on something else. Our public education system has deteriorated alarmingly. We have failed to provide health care to all our citizens and neglected our responsibilities as the world's number one polluter. Most important, we have lost our competitiveness as a manufacturer for civilian needs, an infinitely more efficient use of scarce resources than arms manufacturing.....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mr Rabble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Professor Johnson IS the smartest guy in the room.
This is his area of expertise and people would be wise indeed to pay attention to what he is saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good article
He's missing Saudi Arabia (@ about $40 billion/year) from his list of military expenditures but his main points about adventurism and the flaws of Keynesian economics are solid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. Great Article - Wrong Chart included however
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 11:20 AM by Phred42
Here is a more realistic graph that includes TOTAL US Military Spend

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. when I see such obvious misspellings, I don't believe the source
I don't doubt that the US spends more on military than the rest of the world combined. However, when I see the word "discretionary" so misspelled, I would look around for another site to support the statistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Hung up on Spelling? Odd thing to get hung up on considering.....
Edited on Mon Apr-28-08 08:46 AM by Phred42
I provided the Source (they spell better than I do ) you might have started there.

Apparently aren't familiar with THE GOOGLE so here - I'll spoon feed you this time.

http://www.armscontrolcenter.org/policy/securityspending/articles/fy09_dod_request_global/

Keep in mind there are other sites too.

ALso - you might take a little time with THE GOOGLE and look back. The US has been outspending the rest of the world on the Military Budget for a long time. The 2008 budget ain't nuttin new.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Chart is wrong.
misinterpreted raw data - correction to follow

My apologese
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. Here is the Corrected Graph
Edited on Tue Apr-29-08 08:05 AM by Phred42
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, the wingers always talk about how Medicare & SS & LBJ's
war on poverty broke the country. In fact 40 years of the great society has put less of a strain on the budget than every 2 months in Iraq.

I would love to see Blackwater and KBR prosecuted for racketeering and war profiteering and have their profits for the last 5 years confiscated and applied to the SCHIP program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Damn good point!
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 12:12 PM by Phred42
...In fact 40 years of the great society has put less of a strain on the budget AND TAXPAYER than every 2 months in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LongTomH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Damn straight!
We need to throw this in the faces of the pundits every time they talk about the need to cut Social Security and Medicare - and all social spending in general. Naomi Klein's book: The Shock Doctrine details the right's strategy: cut social spending to the bone and sell or give assets built with public money to the private sector.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. K & R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. Foreign military aid is also a factor in exporting militarism
"on the cheap". We don't often hear about this list:

http://www.publicintegrity.org/militaryaid/World.aspx

but that's another way our taxes wind up elsewhere, and this part is off the Pentagon's books.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. Also says how military spending will eventually become a burden on our economy:
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 12:52 PM by Democrats_win
"after an initial demand stimulus, by about the sixth year the effect of increased military spending turns negative."

Contrast this with the claim that bush makes about how his military spending is helping our economy. Yes, it DID help, but not any more. Paul Krugman doesn't even get this important and historical point!

Human history is full of this lesson: The king starts a war and eventually the people get fed up with it because it's too expensive.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thank You All for the Intelligent Comments and Supplemental Info!!
This community is one I'm honored to belong to, with all you caring, thinking people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bronxiteforever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. "a bankrupt nation is a defenselss nation" -Dwight Eisenhower
"When people speak to you about a preventive war, you tell them to go and fight it. After my experience, I have come to hate war."

" Every gun that's made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, signifies a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and not clothed. This world in arms...is spending the genius of its scientists, the sweat of its laborers,”

“We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security.”

all of these are from Eisenhower-It is amazing how little has been learned

-K & R great article

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Your quote -
made my blood run cold. I'm thinking about the US, and its now bankrupt state. What's next? How will we pull through this?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrdmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:42 AM
Response to Original message
13. K and R for others to read n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
18. Yeah we're broke
We're also not unique. Our style of governance is also not the first that's ever been tried = Empire. In fact, we've been a Super-Empire.

Shoddy little Roman Empire they were just pikers compared to us. Same thing with the British Empire.

The bigger they are the harder they fall.:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC