Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Uribe Would Be Involved in the “Final Offensive” Against Venezuela

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
JohnnyCougar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:34 PM
Original message
Uribe Would Be Involved in the “Final Offensive” Against Venezuela
Source: Venezuelanalysis

The so-called “final offensive” against Venezuela (the purpose of which is to take President Chávez out of power) is being planned presumably from Colombia, and would be executed by that country’s army, according to agreements between Colombian President Álvaro Uribe and “the known agent of the intelligence services of the United States,” William Brownfield.

This information is recorded in the document titled “Shock and Awe Theory in Venezuela: Provoke a State of Shock In Order to Command Respect,” presented to the Public Ministry by former Venezuelan Attorney General Isaías Rodríguez when he went to make declarations regarding the Danilo Anderson case last Friday. Citing sources from the Security Administration Department (DAS) of Colombia, the document recounts a recent private meeting in which Ambassador Brownfield, President Uribe, Colombian Vice President Francisco Santos, and Colombian Defense Minister Juan Manuel Santos participated. They conversed about plans to promote the “secession of the state of Zulia, Venezuela.”

The source from within the DAS said that the ambassador made reference to a previous conversation he had with the United States Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who reportedly said: “The structure will be set up in the oil state, and the collaboration of Governor Manuel Rosales,” but the support of the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia is still lacking. The source added, “the Venezuelan army will by displaced to impede the autonomy and in that moment is when the paramilitaries come into play. Uribe interrupted to express that this action was very dangerous and that he did not think Venezuelans would accept the state’s separation. I know the Venezuelans well and they will not accept this, so perhaps this favors Chávez.”

Francisco Santos rebutted Uribe, saying that “the idea is to distract Chávez while the other part of the plan is carried out in Caracas, Valencia, and Maracay”. Brownfield calmed Uribe, saying “don´t worry, everything is already prepared, we’ve been in Venezuela creating the conditions in Zulia for years, now the only thing left is to tie up the loose strings from Colombia and sew together the operation to produce the Venezuelan May.”

Read more: http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/news/3424



Another attempt at a coup in Venezuela? This administration really needs to be jailed. For a long, long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. and how does Colombia have the military power to do this?
oh right, they don't. Any strike inside Venezuela would be at FARC camps using Venezuelan territory to wage a rebellion against Colombia. Who will be the next country Caracas claims is about to invade to distract attention from things at home?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ekwhite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Nice Republican talking points there
They will get their military where it usually comes from - the United States. They will be the proxy used to attack Venezuela and teach South America the price for disobeying our government. Read "The Shock Doctrine," by Naomi Klein, or anything by Noam Chomsky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. still doesn't address my point
Colombia can't defeat FARC, despite thirty years of us military assistance. And now they're going to go invade Venezuela? A country with a million men under arms or with ready access to arms? Will they be abandoning bogota to farc to fight a much larger, better equipped military force on it's home territory? Really? This makes sense to you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyCougar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. It's not Colombia alone...
It would be with the help of factions within Venezuela, including the state of Zulia.

Anyways, there is little likelihood of all this happening now that Brazil has joined the group of nations wanting to create a South American defense council. I don't think Colombia wants to start a war versus Venezuela, Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Bolivia, probably Chile, and most recently, Paraguay. Uribe was smart to oppose this silly plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. agreed and what timing too
Edited on Sun May-11-08 12:25 AM by Bacchus39
given the upcoming release of the INTERPOL report. Colombia is NOT going to invade Venezuela.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyCougar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Wrong again.
Don't you get tired of being wrong?

The Danilo Anderson case has been going on for over three years. Are you suggesting that Chavez started this investigation with the premonition that three years later, he would need some documents from the case to make the US look bad just before some phony FARC documents produced by the specious Colombian government that might make Venezuela look bad?

I've heard some conspiracy theories on here, but this one is pretty far out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyCougar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Did you read the article?
If you read it, it will answer your questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. the same article that notes
that the unified defense forces of Colombia don't support the plan? The same force that can't defeat a local narco-insurgency? That force is going to somehow occupy Caracas? Seems a wee bit unlikely, don't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyCougar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. It's more support than the 2002 coup had.
Edited on Sun May-11-08 01:54 AM by JohnnyCougar
Plus, I'm sure the Colombian paramilitaries would get support from the same Venezuelan terroristocrats and media owners from the 2002 coup.

Remember, this plan is being drawn up by the same Administration that thought Iraq would take "weeks, not months". Making sound decisions isn't as important as making ideologically extreme decisions to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
33. Colombia's armed forces number over 400,000, the largest in Latin America
Thanks to the multi-billion dollar a year support they receive from the U S of A.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaStrega Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. k&r
Yes jailed, and perhaps tortured with it's-not-really-torture tactics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bookmarking.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. “Final Offensive” Against Venezuela
Thanks. USA being the "Pesky Sarpent" - again I guess. Only thing worse would be if referred to as the "Final Solution" against democracy in Venezuala

If you wonder why I reitereated part your title it's because it helps stack up the coffin nails if Googled in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NBachers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. What????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bitchkitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #10
34. He said:
Edited on Sun May-11-08 11:50 AM by bitchkitty
"If you wonder why I reitereated part your title it's because it helps stack up the coffin nails if Googled in the future."

He means that Google bots pick up on the title and it gives more weight to the phrase, and it will likely come up on search engines if that phrase is used as a search term.

I assume that is what you meant to ask by "What?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. "“Final Offensive” Against Venezuela?" Good idea. The more pairs of eyes reading
Edited on Sun May-11-08 02:27 AM by Judi Lynn
this, and actual brains engaged, the better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mudoria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
15. Venezuelanalysis?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyCougar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 03:38 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. If you'll notice, Venezuelanalysis did not write the article
It was originally published in Ultimas Noticias.

Anyhow, Venezuelanalysis seems to be the only place to get unbiased coverage of Venezuela.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 03:43 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Sad, isn't it? They carry information from a huge number of sources. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 04:41 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. True indeed
and comments from halfwits are best ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 05:31 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. Is this the Chilian tabloid?
Edited on Sun May-11-08 05:32 AM by hack89
or is it a common name for papers in SA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #23
39. Please allow me to supply a little background on the Chilean tabloid to which you refer:
Edited on Sun May-11-08 07:46 PM by Judi Lynn
September 11, a day of infamy in the U.S., is also a dark day in the history of Chile. This 9/11 marks the thirtieth anniversary of the coup that brought General Augusta Pinochet to power. Although former U.S. officials such as Henry Kissinger have insisted that Washington had no involvement in the military takeover, and was trying only to preserve democracy in Chile, CIA and White House records, analyzed here for the first time, show how the CIA used Chilean media to undermine the democratically elected government of Socialist Salvador Allende, an operation that "played a significant role in setting the stage for the military coup of 11 September 1973." From these documents emerges the story of the agency's main propaganda project - authorized at the highest level of the U.S. government - which relied upon Chile's leading newspaper, El Mercuric, and its well-connected owner, Agustin Edwards. In Chile, the aged Edwards remains an influential media power, and here in the U.S., covert action has again been unleashed and executive-branch secrecy is on the rise. The story behind 9/11/73 continues to echo.

For the better part of two years, a group of editors, journalism students, and human rights lawyers in Santiago, Chile, have been gathering evidence against their country's leading media mogul, Agustin Edwards, to, at minimum, have him expelled from the press guild, the Academy of Chilean Journalists. The editor of the leftist magazine Punto Final, Manuel Cabieses, has filed a formal petition accusing Edwards of violating the academy's code of ethics by conspiring with the Nixon White House and the CIA between 1970 and 1973 to foment the military coup that overthrew the elected government of Salvador Allende and brought General Auguste Pinochet to power, thirty years ago this month.

"Doonie," as Edwards is known to his closest friends, is the patriarch of the press - a Chilean Rupert Murdoch. His media empire encompasses Chile's renowned national newspaper, El Mercurio, a second national paper, Ultimas Noticias, and Santiago's leading afternoon paper, La Segunda, along with a dozen smaller regional journals. In September 1970, when Chileans narrowly elected Allende, a Socialist, to the presidency, Edwards was widely considered to be the richest man in Chile - and the individual with the most to lose financially from Allende's election.

The ethics charges against Edwards are likely to receive a boost from a careful analysis of formerly secret U.S. documents that shed considerable new light on CIA covert media operations in Chile. Since 1975, when a special congressional committee chaired by Idaho Senator Frank Church issued its report, Covert Action in Chile: 1963-1973, it has been no secret that the CIA provided significant funding to El Mercurio, put reporters and editors on its payroll, and used the paper, in the committee's words, as "the most important channel for anti-Allende propaganda." But with the declassification of thousands of CIA and White House records at the end of the Clinton administration, the history of the "El Mercurio Project" emerges in far greater detail. Among the key revelations in the documents:

* Even before Allende was inaugurated as president of Chile, Edwards came to Washington and discussed with the CIA the "timing for possible military action" to prevent Allende from taking office.

* President Nixon directly authorized massive funding to the newspaper. The White House approved close to $2 million dollars - a significant sum when turned into Chilean currency on the black market.

* Secret CIA cables from mid-1973 identified El Mercurio as among the "most militant parts of the opposition" pushing for military intervention to overthrow Allende.

* In the aftermath of the coup, the CIA continued to covertly finance media operations in order to influence Chilean public opinion in favor of the new military regime, despite General Pinochet's brutal repression.


The documents provide the most comprehensive record to date of one of the CIA's most famous covert propaganda projects, one that in retrospect played a far greater role than previously understood in the run-up to Pinochet's dictatorship. And they shed new light on the willingness of Chile's leading newspaper - a paper often compared in prestige and importance within Chile to The New York Times in America - to collaborate in fomenting the coup.

More:
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3613/is_200309/ai_n9294265/pg_1

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

However, I'm certain the poster did NOT use the "Chilean tabloid" as a source. What WOULD be the point, since it wouldn't be credible?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #17
27. "only place to get unbiased coverage of Venezuela" hahaha ha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judasdisney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #27
38. No specific argument against Venezuelanalysis, Bacchus39? Just more juvenalia?
Venezuelanalysis looks to me like a fairly decent, ordinary news aggregator of non-U.S. monopoly news.

Are you one of those DLCers, Bacchus, who claims that Chavez is a "dictator" and that the Venezuelan elections, monitored by Jimmy Carter, don't count (and neither does the overwhelmingly pro-Chavez National Assembly, also voted by the Venezuelan people...)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpikeTss Donating Member (308 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 03:49 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. I know a lot of people

who are genuinely scared of Web sites like this one. And I'm glad that they are, because the joke is really on the mainstream media. Scientific studies, like the work of Edward Herman ('Manufacturing Consent'), have proved in the past that mainstream publications fail badly when it comes to offer unbiased reporting. So it really is a relief that sites like venezuelanalysis.com exist and correct the distorted news in our newspapers and magazines.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=sirvWxLHNo8

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 04:42 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Just saw the video you posted, thanks. There was another linked on the same page,
" The Myth of the Liberal Media: The Propaganda Model of News,"
http://youtube.com/watch?v=KYlyb1Bx9Ic&feature=related

Also very interesting.

Welcome to D.U., SpikeTss. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpikeTss Donating Member (308 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 05:02 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Thank you!

I don't know if you read the book (Manufacturing ...), but if you didn't, you should! It takes some time to read, but for a scientific study it's really well written. One of the most fascinating parts of the book is when Herman and Chomsky compare the number and amount of articles about atrocities conducted by the West with those of 'the enemy'. They really proved with studies like these that 'our' media institutions are anything but unbiased or neutral.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #21
29. Morning Judi
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Hey, fascisthunter!


They're out early, aren't they? How many of these should we order?




Hope they'll go quietly.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnie624 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #19
32. No mainstream media outlet in the U.S.
can compare to the depth of coverage by venezuelanalysis.com on the events in Latin America. Any member of DU who says otherwise is definitely dissembling.

I guess I'm going to have to break down and upgrade to a high speed internet account so I can download video.

Some information on U.S. media for anyone who is interested (many subsequent links):

<http://www.globalissues.org/HumanRights/Media/USA.asp>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nikto Donating Member (414 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
16. I wouldn't put this past Bu$hCo.
So it's a stupid idea--Big f'n deal. Bu$hCo LOVES stupid ideas--Just as long
as they fit their obsessive corporatist/neo-con ideology.

And this idea sure does.

This criminal administration will probably hit SOMEBODY
before they depart.

It's so obvious, the're dying to do it.

May be it won't be Iran.

Maybe Syria?

Maybe Venezuela?

But for sure, it'll be some place with OIL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
26. Lest we forget: George Bush Sr. May Face Charges: Conspiring to Kidnap and Murder Political Activis
George Bush Sr. May Face Charges: Conspiring to Kidnap and Murder Political Activists
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2459135

What do they want, a 2-fer??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
28. Sick... Neo-nuts are some serious whackjobs that need to be thrown into rubber rooms
They just don't get it.... bad blood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
30. They'll never pull it off
it's too exposed now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bitchkitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
35. Not only jailed, but
written about. Their crimes should be in every American history textbook so future generations know the truth. God knows they won't get it from the news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnie624 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Too bad our history textbooks
are designed to create obedient, patriotic Americans instead of informed and educated ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
37. STOP THE COLOMBIA TRADE AGREEMENT!!!!!!
They're still working on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
40. Peculiar news you would want to know about: Colombian gov't infiltrated by 'paras'-witness
Edited on Sun May-11-08 10:40 PM by Judi Lynn
Colombian gov't infiltrated by 'paras'-witness
Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:16pm EDT


By Hugh Bronstein

BOGOTA, April 18 (Reuters) - Colombian government ministries and other state institutions are infiltrated by outlawed right-wing militias, a witness told judges in testimony on Friday that could further imperil a U.S. trade deal.

More than 60 members of Congress, most from President Alvaro Uribe's conservative coalition, are being investigated for possible links to drug-running paramilitaries who have terrorized Colombia for years in the name of combating left-wing rebels.

The probe's star witness, former intelligence official Rafael Garcia, now in jail for erasing the criminal histories of paramilitary leaders from a government database, told the Supreme Court the armed forces, government ministries and other institutions were also rife with "paras."

"Congress is not the only institution penetrated by the paramilitaries," he said while testifying against a senator caught in the scandal.

The allegation could increase resistance in Washington to a U.S.-Colombia free trade deal, blocked by House of Representatives Democrats concerned that Uribe is not doing enough to protect labor union members who are often targeted by the paramilitaries.

More:
http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSN18328388
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
41. News of hideous massacres by Colombian death squads near Venezuelan border, found by chance
in a simple search today, and posted elsewhere. I think this information definitely has a place in this thread, as it gives background it's very hard to come by ordinarily in the States. This was taken from the Australian Green Left site:

~snip~
A recent series of articles in the Caracas daily Ultimas Noticias has exposed the serious situation in Venezuela’s frontier states. On July 9, UN revealed that over 70% of businesses in Tachira state, which borders Colombia, have to pay a vacuna (“vaccine”) as protection money to Colombian paramilitary gangs.

“The crime wave in Tachira began on August 15, 2002, with the death of a police agent, Freddy Sanchez. From that moment, the spiral has been increasing, and it would appear there is no way of stopping it, at least in the short or medium term”, Ramon Buitrago, from the Popular Network for Monitoring Human Rights in Tachira state, told UN.

In 1999, there were 81 assassinations in Tachira, according to Buitrago’s group, and there were 93 in 2001. These figures increased dramatically in 2002, with 212 murders. By 2005 this figure had almost trebled to 566. “Therefore, we’re talking 2037 assassinations in the last seven years. It is clear that this figure much larger because we are only reporting those that have recorded”, said Buitrago.

Buitrago said that there was evidence of both former and active-duty police officers being involved in some of the killings. The crimes were brutal, characteristic of the paramilitaries, who always leave a personal mark to serve as a warning to the general population.

The frontier corridor between the states of Tachira, Apure, and Zulia, and the Colombian regions of Santander, Arauca and La Guajira, has always been an extremely important route for the movement of military equipment, arms, explosives, wounded combatants, and food supplies. For many years, it has also served as a route for the transport of drugs, the paper reported.

“When the Colombian government realised they had lost the battle {against left-wing Colombian guerrillas} in a very important zone, the fumigation of illegal cultivation of coca became worse. They also destroyed many other food crops that had allowed the campesinos and their communities to survive. In spite of this, {the Colombian government} did not achieve control of the territory, so they began to support paramilitary groups, such as the Auto-Defence Units of Colombia (AUC), whom they not only trained but also assisted to do the dirty work of extortion with guns”, an unnamed social investigator told UN.

Little by little, the cultivation of coca in the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Arauca, Casanare, Boyaca, and the north of Santander in Colombia came under the paramilitaries’ control.

After a couple of battles, the paramilitaries took almost total control of the distribution of drugs in the frontier, and began to sow terror, carrying out horrific murders in the areas of Colombia very close to Venezuela. An example is the May 1999 massacre of 40 people in La Gavarra at the hands of the AUC. Five trucks full of AUC equipment escorted by the Colombian military was installed at the paramilitaries’ military base on the banks of the river Tarra, which they announced publicly.

As a reprisal against an attack by left-wing guerrillas, and to set a precedent, the paramilitaries took 20 campesinos, cut them in half with an electric saw while they were still alive, and then killed another 20. From this date, life in the frontier zone changed forever, the July 9 UN reported.

Pablo Rodriguez, editor of San Cristobal’s La Nation, told UN: “The paramilitaries began to arrive in Tachira in 2000. Initially, they settled in Urena, then silently they expanded to San Antonio. First, they contacted the business community, from whom they extorted the vacuna, in exchange for guaranteeing their property and preventing them being robbed or assaulted.”

The paramilitaries began to kill people who had a criminal record such as drug-dealers. Bodies would appear in the streets of different cities, horribly mutilated by electric saws, with the aim of spreading terror among the population.

Six years after entering Venezuela, the paramilitaries can be found operating in almost all the municipalities of Tachira, some of Apure, and in areas of Barinas.
“Nobody refuses to pay the vacuna. Everybody collaborates, because the only other option is death, simply because one is accused of supporting the {left-wing} guerrillas”, Rodriguez said.

He claimed that the Venezuelan security forces know the movement of these people and that some security officials are actively involved in these groups, but the government hadn’t done anything to stop this.

Ronald Blanco la Cruz, Tachira’s governor, says that the paramilitary presence in Venezuela is a direct consequence of the US-backed “Plan Colombia” — the military offensive against guerrilla forces in Colombia under the guise of fighting drug trafficking — and of the support that the Colombian army gives to the paramilitaries.

He also said that the “presence of the paramilitaries can be seen as {troublemaking} by a totally weak {Venezuelan} opposition, looking for support to combat the revolutionary process ...”

He accused the opposition of contracting paramilitaries to assassinate campesinos “to create terror, and an atmosphere in which there appears no government, no security, in order to play the game of US imperialism, which does not want any progressive government to exist. And they find in Colombia their best ally.”

Blanco added: “We have consistently asked the National Assembly to approve the Law of Frontiers, and the Law Against Extortion and Kidnappings, and that they modify the Penal Processing Code for the protection of witnesses. We have also asked that attention be paid to judges and prosecutors who are constantly being threatened. Right now, this is not a regional but a national problem, for the entire Venezuelan state, so they try to contain this total explosion of violence that is engulfing us.”
http://www.greenleft.org.au/2006/683/8029

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC