Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Powell Effect to Replace the Bradley Effect?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Stingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:59 PM
Original message
The Powell Effect to Replace the Bradley Effect?
Republicans are skewered again by one of their own — the timing of Colin Powell’s endorsement couldn’t be better. This may become known as the Powell Effect, to cancel out the dread Bradley Effect. One thing, it has moved the momentum back to Obama, and has erased William Ayers, and even Sarah Palin on SNL, from the news radar.

http://allspinzone.com/wp/2008/10/19/the-powell-effect-to-replace-the-bradley-effect/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. I understand that everyone is gushing over the
Powell endorsement, but we shouldn't forget that Powell is a war criminal; one of the worse we currently have roaming about our country. Democrats should not want his endorsement, they should work to have him indited...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 04:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I can forget that, for a bit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caraher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. It's tough
Sad part is, I don't think we'll see any of them in The Hague where they need to be tried. Ever. So in the meantime I appreciate why good people feel a need to play along with the establishment. The problem is that complicity in waging aggressive war is so widespread that it can't be brought up "in polite company." And that's where reclaiming the White House - and starting to dismantle the worst of the Bush legacy - happens.

My wife says she can forgive Powell. I'd agree with you that putting in a good word for Obama cannot erase the bloodstains, but sadly justice is politically inexpedient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I agree with you that justice is politically inexpedient,
but that is what makes me worry that things won't change. The people who are surrounding Obama are better than the ones around McCain and Bush - but who wouldn't be? Many of Obama's advisers are just as imperialistic as McCain's are. I agree that Obama will be a better President than McCain, but that is relatively faint praise...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KSDiva Donating Member (136 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I can forgive him
I think he was lied to and played just like the rest of us were. And he got out as soon as he could. He has a lot to atone for and I think endorsing someone who can fix some of the neocon mistakes he was involved with is a good start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. No way was Powell duped.
He knew exactly what he was doing the whole time he was doing it. He argued against the war, but when the Bush Regime lied us into war Powell stay with them and helped them. He is a blood-covered war criminal and Democrats should be ashamed to defend him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Whether he was duped or not
Matters not a whit right now. We've got an election to worry ab out, not placing blame from 5 and more years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. So the statute of limitation for murder is five years, eh?
Hundreds of thousands of killed and maimed, but who's to blame? Is that about it? Not only is impeachment off the table, but any culpability of the main criminals is also now off the table? And all because it might be politically expedient? We may never be able to bring these war criminals to justice, but sucking up to them for political gain is sickening, demeaning, shameful. If this is what the Democratic Party has come to, then this country has no hope left at all...

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC