Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dave Lindorff: Obama and Holder Must Prosecute War Crimes or Be Guilty of Them Themselves

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 08:46 PM
Original message
Dave Lindorff: Obama and Holder Must Prosecute War Crimes or Be Guilty of Them Themselves
http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/lindorff/208

The dithering and ducking going on in the Obama White House and the Holder Justice Department over the crimes of the Bush Administration are taking on a comic aspect.

On one hand, we have President Obama assuring us that under his administration, there will be respect for the rule of law and, on the other hand, we have this one-time constitutional law professor and his attorney general declaiming that there is no need for the appointment of a prosecutor to bring charges against the people in the last administration, the CIA, National Security Agency, Defense Department, and the military who clearly have broken the law in serious and felonious ways.

What gets silly is that America is either a nation of laws...or it isn't. It is either a place where "nobody is above the law"...or it isn't.

There is really no middle ground here.

The latest solid and incontrovertible evidence of outrageous and criminal behavior by the White House is the discovery -- and the public release by the Obama Administration -- of documentary evidence that the CIA committed not just torture but willful obstruction of justice by destroying videotapes of some 92 interrogations of terrorism suspects and captives in the so-called Bush "War" on Terror. Plus the release of a stack of nine legal opinions by White House and Justice Department lawyers providing legal cover for torture, including executive orders from President Bush and directives from then Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld authorizing torture.

We now know that those legal opinions were so blatantly illegal and simply designed to provide cover that the authors -- former Deputy Assistant Attorney General John Yoo (now ensconsed in a tenured faculty position at the law school of UC Berkeley where he teaches, with a straight face, constitutional law, and writes a syndicated opinion column on similar topics), and his then boss, Jay Bybee, then Assistant Attorney General for the Office of White House Legal Counsel, and now an appeals court judge for the Ninth Circuit Federal Court of Appeals in San Francisco -- had them classified, simply to hide them from public inspection. For those memos alone, Yoo should be fired from his teaching post and disbarred, while Bybee, who failed to mention his activities during his judicial confirmation hearings, should be impeached. That would just be for starters.

Setting aside the many other crimes of the Bush Administration for a moment -- the authorization of a massive warrantless electronic spying program on Americans, the use of military personnel to actively spy on groups engaged in lawful First Amendment activities, the lying about reasons for going to war in Iraq, et al. -- the issue of officially sanctioned acts of torture by American forces, which we know occurred, is not just a crime under the U.S. Criminal Code, which since 1996 has incorporated the Geneva Conventions specifically as U.S. law. The planning and sanctioning of torture, as well as the covering up of torture, and the failure to punish torture are also crimes.

The Obama Administration may, on the basis of whatever twisted political logic it is operating under, not want to appoint a prosecutor and indict the war criminals of the Bush Administration. But this is not a question of whether or not to push for health care or labor law reform, where the Obama Administration has a right to consider what the political pros and cons are of moving forward. Here, we're talking about enforcing the law. There are no options but acting. Not only does a commitment to the rule of law require prosecution here, right up to the president and vice president, but also the failure to prosecute war criminals is in itself a crime, meaning that there is a narrow window of time to act before Obama himself, and his attorney general Eric Holder, will be open to charges that they too are war criminals.

If we don't get a prosecution going of Bush Administration officials responsible for war crimes, the day will come when not only will George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, and Donald Rumsfeld be unable to travel abroad, but also Barack Obama and Eric Holder will also be confined to U.S. soil.

To join the campaign to make the Obama Administration obey the law and prosecute war crimes by the last administration, go here.

DAVE LINDORFF is a Philadelphia-based journalist. His latest book is "The Case for Impeachment" (St. Martin's Press, 2006 and now available in signed collector's edition hardcover or in paperback direct from the author). Order through http://www.thiscantbehappening.net, where you can also read other work by the author.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. I want Obama to prosecute as well, but I'm not gonna call him a war ciminal if he doesn't...
Because I'm not a fucking jackass.

Well, at least not for THAT reason. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EraOfResponsibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. thank you, I am so tired of that bullshit
everytime Jonathan Turley goes on Countown he says the same crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Really?
Do you know what an accomplice after the fact is? He now has access to all of the Executive Privilege items that Bush did. The clock is ticking and it's ticking fast. Obama has a short window of opportunity before he becomes an accomplice. I think he may be one of the best Presidents we ever have and it would be a big disappointment if instead he became an accomplice to the worst President ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Thank you
Facing facts seems a nearly universal difficulty. Let's hope Obama can face this one. But he should arrest the bastards first, to avoid assassination attempts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. You Can Call Him "Mr. Pitiful" If You Like...
...but that doesn't change the reality of http://www.talkingimpeachment.com/blog/Hall-of-Shame-Inductee----Barak-Obama.html">what he has been for literally years.

And FWIW the jackass -- unlike the torturer -- is a noble, hard-working creature. Not to mention the symbol of our political party -- that's supposed to stand for something more than the neo-fascist election thieves.

--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. if you know someone murdered someone and you do not report it
you become an accessory after the fact.

Such is the rule of law.

And if Obama and Congress let war criminals go unpunished, they are, in fact, accessories to those crimes.

It has nothing to do with whether one is a 'jackass' or not. It has to do with the Rule of Law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. Dealbreaker
I can tolerate all his centrist bullshit fixes for the economy and health care. But letting the murderers walk will earn my undying hatred. Turning a blind eye to torture, murder (many torture victims were tortured to death) and the past administrations legal opinions authorizing them will simply guarantee the future of AMERICAN DEATH CAMPS. That is the next logical step for whatever right-wing whack job that comes after him. President Obama will be responsible, even more so than Bush, for legitimizing torture and murder in the name of the American people.

He need do no more than appoint a special prosecutor and wash his hands of it. If he lacks the moral courage to let the AG do it, he can simply take this special prosecutor approach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. I'm glad it's not just me, Hawkowl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 05:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. With the recent release of the bush** memos on suspending the
1st Amendment, allowing the military to operate and arrest in the US, and all the rest, I find it mind boggling that this administration wouldn't arrest and prosecute if not for anyone but our children and grandchildren. I mean, if we do not show that treason is unacceptable then we are done as a nation. The ignorance of anyone arguing in favor of the 'let us just move on' bullshit can't be measured.

Not investigating the first bush administration, oh hell, just letting Nixon and the boys walk away unscathed, gave us the 8 years of Chimpy and his sidekick, Shotgun Dick Cheney.

We either are a nation of laws and we uphold the Constitution, or we're done as a country. And the dems are done as a party. Because like you (and others like us) we will be gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. Not. Gonna. Happen.
We've got a somewhat right-of-center corporatist president. That's MUCH better than the last mob, probably about the best we could have done, and we should be somewhat happy for that as we hold his feet to the fire for things like health care, backing off wars of idiocy, stopping the theocratic encroachments and other things that it's POSSIBLE to influence, but let's not be silly.

At least most of the extremist acolytes have stopped with the tiresome delusion of his somehow turning left and being a progressive, and we should be pleased with some of his stances on labor and science, but he's A CORPORATIST to the marrow. Health Care will be done through Medicine Incorporated, Banks will NOT be nationalized unless it's absolutely unavoidable (and too late), he will NOT pursue or prosecute the Bushies on their war lies and other constitutional destruction. It's not going to happen. He has no intention of doing so. He will do as he always does and duck the question, leaving both sides feeling he's on their side, and say it's up to Congress as he works behind the scenes to delay and undercut any Congressional action.

This should NOT BE A SURPRISE. It shouldn't be any more of a surprise than sucking up to Citigroup and Rubin's Rangers. Get it through your fucking heads: this is what he is, and this is what he simply won't do.

Much as they were and are fiends and deserve to be hung in iron cages, it's probably best to not pursue them; the vindictiveness of the reactionaries would be incredibly destructive at a perilous time like this. The powers-that-be have adequately vetted our President. That's just the way it is.

Dammit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
specimenfred1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. "Get it through your fucking head", he has no choice
War crimes are never forgotten. If the U.S. doesn't prosecute them, another country will and the U.S. will lose what little credibility we have left. It's not a decision that needs to be made, it's already been made by the crimes themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
13. Well said
We have the rule of law, or we do not. Selective enforcement is not justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC