Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How food-service providers like Sodexo bilk millions from taxpayers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 05:26 PM
Original message
How food-service providers like Sodexo bilk millions from taxpayers

At the end of the 2006 school year, children’s nutrition advocate Dorothy Brayley had a disturbing conversation with a local dairy representative. He had come to her office to discuss participation in the summer trade show of food providers she runs as director of Kids First Rhode Island.

At the time, the state’s schools were buying 100,000 containers of milk each week. The salesman for Garelick Farms, New England’s largest dairy, told Brayley that Sodexo—a food and facility management corporation that managed most of the state’s school lunch programs—was paying Garelick more than competitors in order to get a bigger rebate.

State Education Department records, which are required to chart milk prices, showed that Sodexo passed on the price hike, billing schools 24 cents to 27 cents a half-pint, while milk was available from Aramark, a competing company, for 18 cents to 21 cents a half-pint — a loss to schools and families of more than $100,000 a year.

That’s just a taste of the hundreds of millions of dollars of “rebates”—or kickbacks from suppliers—that Sodexo, a $20 billion-a-year global leader in the food and facility management industry, has taken while operating cafeterias and other facilities for schools, hospitals, universities, government agencies, the military and private companies across the country, according to evidence provided by whistleblowers and internal company documents.

In some cases, such rebates violate the contracting policies of federal agencies. In others, undisclosed rebates may constitute fraud.

Sodexo’s deputy counsel Tom Morse declined to reveal the size of Sodexo’s rebate from Garelick Farms, and he rejected the notion that rebates are abusive. Dean Foods, which owns the dairy, declined to comment.

How the rebates work
Sodexo, founded in France in the ’60s to do maritime catering, now has more than 30,500 operating sites and 355,000 employees in 80 countries. It reported revenues last year of $20.4 billion, and profits of more than $1 billion. It ranks second in food services worldwide, after U.K.-based Compass Group.

The rebate system, endemic to the industry, works like this: A food management company like Sodexo signs contracts to run a client’s cafeteria. The company buys supplies from vendors such as Coke, Kellogg’s or Tyson. Then, chosen vendors send the management company rebates based on a percentage of sales.

Tom MacDermott, a New Hampshire industry consultant who negotiates for clients with Sodexo and others, says kickbacks date back half a century.

“In the ’50s, it was cash in an envelope slipped to the chef,” says MacDermott. “As companies grew, they were getting back 5 percent from the produce vendor, 2 percent from the meat guy, 2 or 3 percent from dry goods and dairy.”

In the United States, MacDermott estimates that management companies such as Sodexo, Compass and Aramark provide meals, catering and vending machines to virtually every federal agency, 95 percent of corporations with food service, 90 percent of universities, 40 percent of healthcare facilities, and 30 percent of schools. If you’ve eaten at a public cafeteria, you’ve probably eaten food sourced by one of these companies.

As major corporations and government institutions increasingly outsourced purchasing, kickbacks to megacorporations like Sodexo became rife — making up at least 10 percent of sales.

Contracts are typically cost-plus, meaning clients pay the cost set by the supplier, plus a percentage of that as a fee set by the food-service firm. There are generally no cost caps, so rebates—which are not deducted from what the food-service company charges clients—mean higher meal prices. They also limit food choice and quality: food-service companies buy products from vendors that pay bigger rebates rather than those that offer cheaper, locally grown, or higher quality food.

http://thekomisarscoop.com/2009/03/03/cafeteria-kickbacks/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. So ti's legalized bribery?
Does the mob still control the food industry? Jeeeeez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Here, we see the profit motive being put ahead of the interests of children and taxpayers.
Edited on Wed Mar-04-09 05:41 PM by Selatius
Profits ahead of the interests of the people, especially children, is what Gandhi labeled a sin: Commerce without morality.

If the state wants to save money and identify new sources of revenue, it might want to allow contracts with private vendors to expire and then do the work itself. That way, at least the profit mark-ups would be removed, saving taxpayers some money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HillbillyBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. both comments say pretty much what I was going to say
it is not legal nor quite unlawful..but it sure should be made against kick backs, it is bribery under another name, and bribery is unlawful.
I try not to use illegal it is not really a proper word, a lawyer friend used to give me a ration about it, saying "illegal is not a proper word, its a sick bird"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Republicans gave a French company the bid? And they hate the French?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. wonder what sort of kickback the Republicans got from the deal. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Anyone that calls themselves a "food service provider" is already ripping us off. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Can you expound a bit on that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. No. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Then it was a meaningless statement, right?
Why did you bother to post it? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Well, clearly it was meaningless to you.
But I would not project that incapacity of yours onto everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sodexo has been protested on some college campuses
http://www.campusdreamz.com/?p=698

The company’s activities in private prisons and in schools have given rise to considerable controversy at over sixty US colleges and institutions. The film Super Size Me criticized Sodexo’s policies on child nutrition in their client schools, featuring Madison Junior High School in Naperville, Illinois. In 2004, UK TV Channel 4 showed a documentary exposing the unhygienic preparation of food by Tillery Valley (a subsidiary of Sodexo).

There have been at least five boycotts of Sodexo, for varying reasons: at the School of Oriental and African Studies at the University of London, at the American University in Washington D.C., and at Université Laval in Quebec City, at Binghamton University in New York, and Allegheny College in Meadville, Pennsylvania. The boycott at the American University was in protest of several of Sodexo’s business relationships and practices: its partnerships with the US Military, its business with prisons, low pay, and poor working conditions. The boycott at Université Laval protested the university administration’s refusal of an initiative by the general student association (CADEUL) to provide food services to the university. Sodexo has come under fire in the UK for doing business with the Harmondsworth Detention Centre, home to many asylum seekers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
9. privatization
Meanwhile farmers are leaving produce in the fields, produce that the government used to buy for government food programs.

We all lose from privatization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sienna86 Donating Member (505 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Sodexo provides "food" for my kids at school
They just installed a "icee" machine in the cafeteria which supplies concentrated fruit juice in a frozen form. The kids love it - so much tastier and fun than milk or water. Only problem is that it supplies 1 1/2 times the recommended sugar grams the kids should be consuming. Sodexo prefers to call that sugar a cabohydrate. Technically correct but so amazing when rates of adult onset diabetes are sky-rocketing. Oh, and it's advertized by the manufacturer as a real money maker. The front office at the school isn't interested im parent complaints.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. not a good deal
Food service in public schools should not be in private hands.

Welcome to DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. Weird Kickback System in Food Industry
Edited on Thu Mar-05-09 04:25 PM by JPZenger
There has always been a weird kickback system in the supermarket industry, which appears related to this matter. If a company wants to sell its goods in a supermarket, it has to offer the supermarket incentives. In effect, the food companies have to buy shelf space. Sometimes the kickback is cash, and other times it is free products for resale. The companies pay more for prominent locations and special displays at the end of an aisle. It is no accident which products are located at eye level, or which companies receive the largest amount of shelf space within any one category. Smaller start-up companies don't stand a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC