Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The US should quit Nato

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 08:49 PM
Original message
The US should quit Nato
When he visits Strasbourg, France, this week to participate in festivities marking Nato's 60th anniversary, President Barack Obama should deliver a valedictory address, announcing his intention to withdraw the United States from the alliance. The US has done its job. It's time for Europe to assume full responsibility for its own security, freeing the US to attend to more urgent priorities.

The creation of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation in 1949 remains a singular example of enlightened statecraft. With Europe's democracies still suffering from the ravages of the second world war, and fearing the threat posed by Stalinist Russia, the US abandoned its aversion to "entangling alliances" and committed itself to Europe's defence. General Dwight Eisenhower came out of retirement to serve as Nato's first military chief. As US forces arrived to take up their stations, the alliance soon found its footing. In its heyday, Nato possessed formidable capabilities and real (if never fully tested) cohesion. Its safety ensured, western Europe prospered and remained at peace.

Over time, the Soviet threat diminished and eventually disappeared. Since then, however, an alliance once regarded as the most successful in all of history has lost its way.

When the end of the cold war left Russia temporarily weakened, the United States and its allies wasted no time in exploiting that weakness. Nato pressed eastward, incorporating into its ranks nations that had previously formed part of the Soviet empire and of the Soviet Union itself. American policy-makers urged the alliance to expand its reach, abandoning its defensive posture to become an instrument of intervention. According to the conventional wisdom of the 1990s, Nato needed to go "out of area" or it would surely go "out of business".
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/apr/03/us-nato-pullout-obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. no thanks n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Russia should join NATO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. yup
if anything nato needs to continue EXPANDING...

i believe it needs to take on the role that the UN is failing at....

by definition nato is suppose to follow UN guidelines anyway...

and since the UN insists on being irrelevent...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeresyLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. NATO should become the UN military.
And expand it's membership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spag68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. NATO
Quitting NATO is not good enough. We should immediately bring home the 50 thousand troops in Germany, the thirty thousand in Japan and however many are in S Korea. Close the bases, let the EU figure out how to raise all the money we spend there. We can no longer be the worlds enforcer and we should not be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I don't mind keeping some folks in S. Korea so long as the Dear Leader is in charge.
I think he is imbalanced, and I feel better knowing that we have a start on him should he really go nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC