Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chicago SunTimes drops Bill O'Reilly; O'Reilly calls for a boycott. Roger Ebert rebuts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 05:55 PM
Original message
Chicago SunTimes drops Bill O'Reilly; O'Reilly calls for a boycott. Roger Ebert rebuts
To: Bill O'Reilly
From: Roger Ebert

Dear Bill: Thanks for including the Chicago Sun-Times on your exclusive list of newspapers on your "Hall of Shame." To be in an O'Reilly Hall of Fame would be a cruel blow to any newspaper. It would place us in the favor of a man who turns red and starts screaming when anyone disagrees with him. My grade-school teacher, wise Sister Nathan, would have called in your parents and recommended counseling with Father Hogben.

Yes, the Sun-Times is liberal, having recently endorsed our first Democrat for President since LBJ. We were founded by Marshall Field one week before Pearl Harbor to provide a liberal voice in Chicago to counter the Tribune, which opposed an American war against Hitler. I'm sure you would have sided with the Trib at the time.

I understand you believe one of the Sun-Times misdemeanors was dropping your syndicated column. My editor informs me that "very few" readers complained about the disappearance of your column, adding, "many more complained about Nancy." I know I did. That was the famous Ernie Bushmiller comic strip in which Sluggo explained that "wow" was "mom" spelled upside-down.

Your column ran in our paper while it was owned by the right-wing polemicists Conrad Black (Baron Black of Coldharbour) and David Radler. We dropped it to save a little money after they looted the paper of millions. Now you call for an advertising boycott. It is unusual to observe a journalist cheering for a newspaper to fail. At present the Sun-Times has no bank debt, but labors under the weight of millions of dollars in tax penalties incurred by Lord Black, who is serving an eight-year stretch for mail fraud and obstruction of justice. We also had to pay for his legal expenses.

There is a major difference between Conrad Black and you: Lord Black is a much better writer and thinker, and authored a respected biography about Roosevelt, who we were founded to defend. That newspapers continue to run your column is a mystery to me, since it is composed of knee-jerk frothings and ravings. If I were an editor searching for a conservative, I wouldn't choose a mad dog. My recommendation: The admirable Charles Krauthammer.

Bill, I am concerned that you have been losing touch with reality recently. Did you really say you are more powerful than any politician?

That reminds me of the famous story about Squeaky the Chicago Mouse. It seems that Squeaky was floating on his back along the Chicago River one day. Approaching the Michigan Avenue lift bridge, he called out: Raise the bridge! I have an erection!

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090407/COMMENTARY/904079997/-1/RSS


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Roger Ebert has evolved into an excellent political commentator
although I take exception to his praise for Krauthammer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Yeah, it's funny, he lost his spoken voice and gained a much better written one
Clearly talent doesn't go away when a voice does. And sadly, the untalented Mr. O'Reilly still has full use of his voice. This world isn't fair, for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh man, that is priceless!
Way to go, Roger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think suggesting the insufferable Krauthammer was better was a nice touch
Ebert is aware that Krauthammer is a mindless, irrational jerk; the fact that he compares Krauthammer favorably to O'Reilly says volumes about what he thinks about O'Reilly's column.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csibona Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ebert kicks butt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. "That's it! The gloves are off! No more Mr Nice Guy!"
:applause::applause::applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rgbecker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. Read about Conrad Black ..Thank goodness he's off the streets until 2013.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conrad_Black

He and Madoff will have a chance to exchange jailhouse stories one day.

Was checking to see if he was the Black that was running McCain's run. Apparently not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sledgehammer Donating Member (774 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Two thumbs way up!!!!!!!! Go Roger!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. Billo & Rush: Next on cable access!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thumbs up! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. Wouldn't have thought an old dude could bring the snark so well.
Damn. Wonkette herself would be impressed. I will argue about Charles Krauthammer being admirable; so far as I'm concerned he's just an uptight extra-starch-on-the-undies purveyor of conventional conservative wisdom. At least he's coherent, though, and that's remarkable enough for righties these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. Where's the
Faux Police when you need them? They know where you live Roger. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC