Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The O'Reilly Procedure [ Roger Ebert's Journal ]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
vow66 Donating Member (167 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 05:37 PM
Original message
The O'Reilly Procedure [ Roger Ebert's Journal ]
http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/06/the_oreilly_procedure.html

Bill O'Reilly has been brought low by the same process that afflicted Jerry Springer. Once respected journalists, they sold their souls for higher ratings, and follow their siren song. Springer is honest about it: "I'm going to Hell for what I do, and I know it," he's likes to say. O'Reilly insists he is dealing only with the truth. When his guests disagree with him, he shouts at them, calls them liars, talks over them, and behaves like a schoolyard bully.

I am not interested in discussing O'Reilly's politics here. That would open a hornet's nest. I am more concerned about the danger he and others like him represent to a civil and peaceful society. He sets a harmful example of acceptable public behavior. He has been an influence on the most worrying trend in the field of news: The polarization of opinion, the elevation of emotional temperature, the predictability of two of the leading cable news channels. A majority of cable news viewers now get their news slanted one way or the other.
-----------------------
How can one effect change? By sincere debate and friendly persuasion? O'Reilly sets the opposite example. He brings on guests who represent the "enemy," doesn't seriously engage their beliefs, and shouts: Be quiet! I'm right and you're wrong! I stand for good and you stand for evil! I'm not exaggerating. Sometimes those are the very words he uses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. OK I know which cable channel slants their news to the right
What I want to know is which channel slnats their news to the left? Ebert says "a majority of cable news viewers now get their news slanted one way or the other". Who is the "other"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomorenomore08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well, I guess Fox is "conservative," while the others are more "centrist,"
but it's all "corporatist" anyway. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. But the point is Ebert said you could get "both sides"
I know you can get the right wing corporate slant from Fox. "Centrist" is not the opposite of right wing. Where can you get the other side?

You are correct, it's the corporate media regardless of which channel you tune to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomorenomore08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Other than Olbermann and Maddow and (sometimes) Cafferty, you don't really get
much "progressive" input. It really says something that arguably the best liberal TV journalist (Jon Stewart) is the host of a comedy show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Let's see, CNN? No. CNBC? No. MSNBC? well not during Morining Joe but ........................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Now O'Reilly will go after Ebert with a vengeance. That's what he does.
That's all he does, anymore, is go after others for real or perceived slights. He's nuts. His interview with Joan Walsh (posted elsewhere here) shows he has lost it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomorenomore08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. And Ebert will whoop his sorry ass!
Intellectually, I mean... O'Reilly's 6-foot-4 and several years younger. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC