Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iran May Quit Nuclear Non-Proliferation Pact If Talks Fail, Lawmaker Says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 10:22 AM
Original message
Iran May Quit Nuclear Non-Proliferation Pact If Talks Fail, Lawmaker Says
Source: Bloomberg

By Ali Sheikholeslami

Sept. 29 (Bloomberg) -- Iran may end its participation in the global nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty if talks this week fail to resolve the international dispute over the country’s atomic development, a member of the parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Committee said.

The West has always had a “carrots and sticks” approach to Iran, said lawmaker Mohammad Karami-Rad, who urged the powers to “end their excuses and negotiate on significant issues,” the state-run Islamic Republic News Agency reported. “If Iran remains under Zionist pressures and U.S. bullying and if the 5+1 talks fail, the parliament will take clear stands, such as quitting the NPT,” he said, referring to Israel and the five permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany

A delegation from Iran will meet in Geneva on Oct. 1 with representatives of the world powers to discuss the Iranian uranium-enrichment program, a project that has prompted three sets of United Nations sanctions. Iran told the UN atomic agency on Sept. 21 that it’s building a second enrichment plant. The U.S., the U.K. and France on Sept. 25 demanded immediate access to the site by UN inspectors.

Uranium enrichment is at the center of Western concerns about Iran’s nuclear program. The process isolates a uranium isotope needed to generate fuel for a nuclear power reactor; in higher concentrations it can be used to make a bomb. Iran denies it is developing a nuclear weapon and insists the enrichment is needed for civilian uses, such as the production of electricity.

Further Sanctions

Iran’s construction of the underground plant may prompt additional economic sanctions, including restrictions on banking and on oil and gas technology, U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates told CNN Sept. 27. Iran denies it violated the rules of the UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency, saying it complied with a requirement to notify the IAEA of the facility’s existence at least 18 months before uranium enters the plant.

Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aFWYTVL7C4ag
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh No
what horrors await when they announce they are no longer going to follow the pact that they have been violating for years. I'm starting to think that runt fundie asshole in Iran is doing everything he can to goad Isreal into attacking in order to turn him into a fucking prophet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Obama asks all non-NPT signatories to join the treaty
United Nations, Sep 24 (ANI): The 15 member United Nations Security Council today asked all non- Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) signatories to join the treaty.

The UNSC summit chaired by US President Barack Obama approved the resolution 1887, calling on countries that have not signed the NPT to comply fully with all their obligations.

Obama said the resolution will strengthen the NPT. “We have made it clear that the Security Council has both the authority and responsibility to respond to violations of this treaty,” foreign news agencies quoted Obama, as saying.

http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/world-news/obama-asks-all-non-npt-signatories-to-join-the-treaty_100251973.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Of course I'm sure israel will be granted a 'special waiver'... eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well, nobody harasses India. Pakistan, and Israel about their nukes.
Edited on Tue Sep-29-09 11:10 AM by bemildred
Lots of nukes too. You can see why that would be more attractive to Iran than the present continual round of invective. If the NPT is only going to be used to beat you over the head with about supposed "violations", then why sign it? I mean it's clear they don't have to participate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Interesting that you would single out Israel rather than India or Pakistan nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daveparts still Donating Member (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Israel has the largest arsenal
and the most belligerent policies in the region. Israel has never opened her facilities to foreign inspection. She would never tolerate the inspections forced on Iran.

Name what parts of the non proliferation treaty Iran has violated? Charges and accusations made by partisans don't count as violations. Iran announced this new facility before it was even complete and this is portrayed to the gullible public as something ominous.

This is about politics, Iran has made it clear its purpose for nuclear power and is entitled under the terms of the treaty to assistance not sanctions.
But our friends can do no wrong and our enemies can do no right more Bush blunders perpetuated by Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC