The United States, Israel, and the Failure of the Western Way of War

[marmar]

from TomDispatch:




The End of (Military) History?
The United States, Israel, and the Failure of the Western Way of War

By Andrew J. Bacevich


“In watching the flow of events over the past decade or so, it is hard to avoid the feeling that something very fundamental has happened in world history.” This sentiment, introducing the essay that made Francis Fukuyama a household name, commands renewed attention today, albeit from a different perspective.

Developments during the 1980s, above all the winding down of the Cold War, had convinced Fukuyama that the “end of history” was at hand. “The triumph of the West, of the Western idea,” he wrote in 1989, “is evident… in the total exhaustion of viable systematic alternatives to Western liberalism.”

Today the West no longer looks quite so triumphant. Yet events during the first decade of the present century have delivered history to another endpoint of sorts. Although Western liberalism may retain considerable appeal, the Western way of war has run its course.

For Fukuyama, history implied ideological competition, a contest pitting democratic capitalism against fascism and communism. When he wrote his famous essay, that contest was reaching an apparently definitive conclusion.

Yet from start to finish, military might had determined that competition’s course as much as ideology. Throughout much of the twentieth century, great powers had vied with one another to create new, or more effective, instruments of coercion. Military innovation assumed many forms. Most obviously, there were the weapons: dreadnoughts and aircraft carriers, rockets and missiles, poison gas, and atomic bombs -- the list is a long one. In their effort to gain an edge, however, nations devoted equal attention to other factors: doctrine and organization, training systems and mobilization schemes, intelligence collection and war plans.

All of this furious activity, whether undertaken by France or Great Britain, Russia or Germany, Japan or the United States, derived from a common belief in the plausibility of victory. Expressed in simplest terms, the Western military tradition could be reduced to this proposition: war remains a viable instrument of statecraft, the accoutrements of modernity serving, if anything, to enhance its utility. ...........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175278/tomgram%3A_andrew_bacevich%2C_giving_up_on_victory%2C_not_war__/#more (the story follows a short intro)

[leveymg]

1. Fukayama assumed that ideology and nationalism was dead. Hardly. What counts is money, and we

don't have it anymore.

The British Empire didn't collapse until it could no longer afford to support itself. So it is with the American Empire, now passing into the oblivion.

[WHEN CRABS ROAR]

2. If we are survive as a human race we will need to change

our ideology, give up war and deal with overpopulation, pollution and resource loss.

[provis99]

3. Fukuyama is a complete fool. Samuel Huntington was completely right.

There is a culture war among civilizations right now; Fukuyama was wrong as usual, like neo-cons always are.

[msongs]

4. long as the US seeks world corporate dominance there will be resistance nt