Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Fox News owned by the Saudis?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 12:47 PM
Original message
Is Fox News owned by the Saudis?


I am biased against FOX News – I detest it. I dislike FOX News for what I think are good reasons. It misinforms. It uses false information to create public opinions that are dividing America. It is nurturing the mob mentality among a certain segment of American society. It is impeding social progress in America. It is using journalistic terrorist tactics against conventional facts. It is making a mockery of long established journalistic standards. It is providing a forum for a sneaker wearing clown with a blackboard to act as a social commentator. It is owned by super rich foreigners who manipulate ill-informed white Americans for some mysterious end. It also pays big money to scurrilous on air people while losing money and having fun doing it. I hate FOX News.

There used to be a black comedian on television called “Redd Foxx.” He was called “Redd” because of his hair color. I like to call FOX News “White Fox” because of the restricted color of its on camera mannequins and the hand puppets who watch them. I think my moniker is a natural fit. So with your kind indulgence, here is what I think about the present state of White Fox and what I see in its future.

The FOX News Channel was created as an alternative to the alleged liberal bias in the major media. In fourteen short years, the network has risen to the top of the clamoring cable clan outdoing CNN and MSNBC. White Fox is the indisputable grand ratings dragon of the cable news competition. White Fox gained 80 million viewers from its launched in 1996. It claims to present a “Fair and Balanced” view of the news, and it has spent millions promoting its brand. White Fox (FNC) is owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation and Saudi Arabian Prince Alwaleed bin Talal. Rupert Murdoch is an Australian business titian, about whom Bill Moyers once said, “He buys lobbyists the way Almeda Marcos bought shoes.” Murdoch has been widely accused of destroying the foundation of American democracy – a free press, as seen in this documentary.

The man who owns the next largest share of FNC is Saudi Arabian Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, who gave former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani ten million dollars for finance relief efforts after 9/11, but then released a statement blaming the attack on the World Trade Center by Saudi hijackers on the United States policy in the Middle East. Giuliani returned the money. These are the two foreigners who control the network that is moulding public opinion among America’s under-informed.



Read more: http://blogcritics.org/culture/article/a-biased-look-at-fox-news/#ixzz0vZAJFNFh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Smirk." - Fox News (R - Saudi)
Edited on Tue Aug-03-10 12:50 PM by SpiralHawk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. hmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoSheep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is Rupert Murdoch owned by the Saudi's?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Al-Waleed bin Talal owns the second largest block of stock. He
votes with Murdock to give Murdock a 50% share in the board room.

Al-Waleed is worth a google. To the Financial Times in 2002, he stated that he did not buy companies to run them, but to show them what they are doing wrong. He also told the Saudi Daily News that boycotting the west was wrong, they should use their money to buy power and influence not only with the governments, but with the social culture so that they could gain economic dominance over the US and its allies.

He bragged in December, 2005, that one call to Murdock change the chyron from muslim riots in Paris to the poor riot in Paris in 30 minutes even though the riots had been linked to Muslim terrorist organizations.

Look at the portfolio of Kingdom Holding (95% owned by Al-Waleed), Citibank, Four Seasons, News Corp, Apple, EBay, the list continues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corpseratemedia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. heh heh
gettin yer teabaggin talkin' points from a Saudi Prince, who delights in humiliating you and keeping you ignorant.

you betcha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Does Bush hold hands with and kiss the Saudi Prince.
Sorta makes a slight bow toward the Emperor of China look like a kids ploy don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. The 9/11 hijackers were almost all Saudis, but xCommander AWOL (R)...
..decided to attack Iraq -- which never had a damn thing to do with 9/11 whatsoever.

What is Fox News (R) hiding?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. Should read, are the *'s owned by the Saudis? (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awnobles Donating Member (132 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. With the CIA
Don't think it coincidence that the CIA chose a foreign owned entity to propagandize the US. It's the one law they had trouble circumventing, operating domestically that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC