Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SIROTA: corporate Democrats days are numbered

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:59 AM
Original message
SIROTA: corporate Democrats days are numbered
The insider candidates won the last round of primaries, but David Sirota adds some context: when a grassroots challenger to an incumbent blessed by the president can come within single digits of winning, the days of Democrats owned by the wealthy are numbered.

The real question is what Obama will do if these turds are flushed out of Congress to the point that they can no longer shape the agenda by threatening to side with Republicans or quietly withholding their cloture vote in the Senate to block desperately needed fundamental change.

If someone says this thread is divisive, you should look at the actions of the corporate Democrats who outspend their progressive challengers then when they win, ignore the will of the Democrats who voted for them as the lesser of two evils.

If the Democratic Party leadership doesn't get their shit together and stop trying to be the other corporate white meat, they will be responsible for any losses in the White House or Congress--or they will be replaced.

Considering Bennet's wealth, corporate fundraising, incumbency and presidential support, it is astounding that a whopping 46 percent of this bellwether state's Democratic voters cast their ballots against him, against their own party's establishment and against their own party's president.

For those who care about a progressive economic agenda and about injecting democracy into the Democratic Party, this is encouraging when put next to the similarly impressive results of White House-thwarting Democratic primary challengers in Pennsylvania and Arkansas. And that trend explains the increasingly fierce pushback from Washington.

Yes, this is why Obama's spokesman, Robert Gibbs, so vociferously berated the progressive movement on the eve of Colorado's primary, and why DNC powerbrokers moved so forcefully against Romanoff. He was the latest candidate to represent what those elites know to be an ascendant national progressive uprising inside the Democratic Party – one that keenly understands money's corrosive effects on public policy and that, therefore, rejects the Beltway's corporatist model.

Seeing that this uprising threatens their power and their D.C. worldview, these elites are desperate to preserve Dark Helmet's principle – so desperate, in fact, they have resorted to employing Obama's presidential campaign infrastructure to prop up more conservative candidates against progressive challengers in intra-party battles.

http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2010/08/elites_democratic_days_are_num.html">FULL TEXT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. "if these turds are flushed out"
Very apt expression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I think that's actually being unfair to turds, but if I described the form of excrement
they are more accurately, people would toss their cookies.

Euphemistically, I could say they are like what comes out during the final stage of ebola.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Turd describes their shape, look, and stink. Cancerous tumor has been what they are..
where their infection has been just about destroying us all, and they are so hard to "flush out of the system". We're going to have to be given heavy doses of chemo for a long while afterward to completely flush their influence out of the party, even after the tumors have been forcibly removed earlier. Hopefully we can get rid of them sufficiently before they kill the party.

In a way, even if they win the primaries, they are more toast in the general election, which in effect makes the Republicans that takes the Blanche Lincoln's place for a term more like the chemotherapy needed to get rid of them. We'll suffer while the Republican "chemo" is there, but later we can start over fresh later if we can replace that Republican with an uncancerous progressive!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. k n r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. "an ascendant national progressive uprising inside the Democratic Party"
make it so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tutankhamun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. This article outlines one reason net neutrality is so incredibly important right now.
The grassroots progressive ascendancy Sirota discusses will die in obscurity with a corporate controlled (read:censored for non-corporatist politics) internet.

As Al Franken said, "Net Neutrality is _the_ First Amendment issue of our time."

Actually, the Senator _understated_ its importance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nightrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. knr. yes, I heartily agree with the principle at hand, and I will be dead by the time
all the flushing is done.

It is a day to day feat, and the sewer system (gubmint) is probably going to need several Roto-Rooterings before all is said and done.

But, the end result will be worth it. Never give up the Democratic principles and values.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. not likely
they have money on their side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. But not God or History.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. K & R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. KR nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
13. We need more of this kind of insight --
and less corporate wing Democrats --

DLC is a cancer growing INSIDE the Democratic Party -- !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colsohlibgal Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
14. I Hope He's Right
Not so sure myself, but he seems like a smart guy hopefully he's prescient in this regard too - the sooner the better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capitalocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
15. Why are they wasting money on primaries anyway?
Shouldn't they use the warchest for the general election, if what's important is having more Democrats in office? Why waste it on a primary?

They obviously have a corporate agenda that takes precedence over winning. And then they tell us we have to show up and win their elections for them because it's all about winning regardless of whether or not you like the individual "Democratic" candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. that's been obvious since Duckworth v. Cegalis.
Cegalis shamed Henry Hyde into retiring by coming too close to beating him in the general election, and the thanks she got from the DLC crowd was Rahm Emanuel recruiting a more corporate compliant Dem to run against her in the primary. Cegalis couldn't match Rahm's money, but Duckworth didn't have a base of enthusiastic supporters to back her in the general election and she lost the open seat to the republican.

The DLC literally chose Wall St. over winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC