Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AFL-CIO: Stronger Financial Reform Would Have Saved Jobs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 07:40 PM
Original message
AFL-CIO: Stronger Financial Reform Would Have Saved Jobs
By Simon Johnson

The Brown-Kaufman SAFE Banking Amendment proposed a hard size cap on our largest banks, limiting their assets to a very small fraction of the size of our economy. The premise was simple – and could fit on a bumper sticker (or in a campaign flyer for November) – “too big to fail” is too big to exist.

But this proposal to modify the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill failed in the Senate in early May, by a vote of 33-61, with 27 Democrats voting against the idea. Since that time, Democratic supporters have been asking their representatives the obvious question: Why did you vote against Brown-Kaufman?

Interestingly, no senators yet have replied – at least on the record – that the power of the megabanks was too great to be overcome. Instead, there are three main arguments going the rounds.

First, some argue that the Brown-Kaufman would by itself not have completely solved all the problems that can cause our financial system to meltdown. As one senator put it in a recent letter, “ would not solve the problem of systemic risk and systemically important institutions in a comprehensive manner.”

in full: http://baselinescenario.com/2010/08/19/afl-cio-stronger-financial-reform-would-have-saved-jobs/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+BaselineScenario+%28The+Baseline+Scenario%29
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yup. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. But that would have required hard work....
Democrats would have had to say mean things about Republicans.

The president and house and Senate leaders might have had to twist arms and threaten to take away leadership positions and committee chairs of dems who obstructed or threatened to vote against the legislation.

It would have been so messy and unpleasant, and if they did it then Democrats might not have gotten all those republican votes they're going to get because they played nice.

Oh wait....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Exactly right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. But Saving Jobs Wasn't the Point, Was It?
The point was stripping all the little people to their bare flesh, and then eating that flesh and cracking the bones and making lampshades of the skin and soap of the fat.

Such monsters rule our nation that the rest of the world is appalled. Those people who are not equally oppressed by their bankers and corporations, or for less developed nations, their unincorporated looters and pillagers, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC