Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supremely Bad Judgment By MAUREEN DOWD

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 05:58 PM
Original message
Supremely Bad Judgment By MAUREEN DOWD
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/24/opinion/24dowd.html?src=ISMR_AP_LO_MST_FB

...Years later, some of the Democrats on that all-male, all-white Senate Judiciary Committee told me they assumed there must have been a consensual romance between the boss and his subordinate. McEwen assumed so, too, because Clarence took Anita with him when he changed agencies. Hill has made it clear she felt no reciprocal attraction.

Joe Biden, the senator who ran those hearings, was leery of the liberal groups eager to use Hill as a pawn to checkmate Thomas. He circumscribed the testimony of women who could have corroborated Hill’s unappetizing portrait of a power-abusing predator.

For the written record, Biden allowed negative accounts only from women who had worked with Thomas. He also ruled out testimony from women who simply had personal relationships with Thomas, and did not respond to a note from McEwen — a former assistant U.S. attorney who had once worked as a counsel for Biden’s committee — reminding him of her long relationship with Thomas.

It’s too late to relitigate the shameful Thomas-Hill hearings. We’re stuck with a justice-for-life who lied his way onto the bench with the help of bullying Republicans and cowed Democrats...


GOOD OLD, GOOD-FOR-NOTHING JOE BIDEN--I THANK MAUREEN DOWD FOR REVEALING WHAT THE SENATE WAS (OR WASN'T) THINKING AT THIS MOMENT OF CRISIS...AND I KNOW WE HAVEN'T HEARD THE LAST OF THIS FIASCO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. yup
and lots of DUers think Biden is such a FINE man
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Biden is a fine man, that doesn't mean he has never made a mistake. Just like making an error in
judgement does not mean he is not a good and fine person.

What is it? You expect them to be perfect?

How about we let the expectation that our politicians must be perfect drop at least until WE ourselves are perfect.

Biden is a fine man, and he has been a fine honorable politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. There is nothing honorable about his whoredom for credit card companies, or the way he
threw Anita Hill under the bus. He was disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. oh but don't you know?
Edited on Sun Oct-24-10 06:15 PM by Skittles
Obama picked him so PRESTO! He is a fine man! GET WITH THE PROGRAM katandmoon!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meowomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. OMG, I forgot!!
We aren't allowed to criticize anything that the president does or says! We have to be just like the rethuglicans or we'll get kicked out of the party!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. +1000 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. LOLOL
Edited on Sun Oct-24-10 06:17 PM by Skittles
I remember when it happened and it was SICKENING - why did Biden go to bat for such a fucking conservative WHORE? Clarence Thomas is quite possibly the worst Supreme Court judge EVER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. It's not like he voted for something astonishing like invading Iraq
Oh wait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Biden is a politician, and as such
cannot be a 'fine' man.

And this was not a "mistake." This was an orchestrated effort to sway the outcome.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. I really don't think we are talking about the same person
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thank you. I don't. Never have, never will. Corporate whoredom at its worst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. Well we can go around the Mulberry Bush and blame Thurgood Marshall
for retiring. I mean after all if he hadn't retired, if he had waited four months or so, when Clinton won the next election, then we wouldn't have had Clarence Thomas and we wouldn't have had Bush appointed president.

Now you can't blame Marshall for retiring, as well as you can't blame Biden for not allowing women who were not under the employ of Thomas for testifying. THE PERSON TO BLAME IS BUSH SR WHO APPOINTED THIS ABSOLUTE PIECE OF S**T.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC