CAPITAL
By DAVID WESSEL
Better Answer to Tough Question on Jobs
October 21, 2004; Page A2
(snip)
A better answer would have gone like this:
"All over America, there are people who played by the rules yet are losing their jobs -- some because workers elsewhere do the same work for less, others because computers do things that once only humans did. It is small comfort to tell them, though it's true, that we're richer today than our grandparents imagined because we haven't walled ourselves off from the rest of the world nor sought to restrain the advance of technology. It is small comfort, though true, that today's puzzle isn't that we're losing jobs -- we're always losing jobs -- but that for reasons even experts can't explain we aren't creating enough new ones.
"Those of us who benefit from low-cost imports -- or who have well-paid export jobs that wouldn't exist if we didn't allow imports and outsourcing -- must not ask those who lose jobs to go it alone. But Bill Clinton had it right 10 years ago: 'The resentment of people who keep working harder and falling further behind, and feel like they've played by the rules and have gotten the shaft, will play out in different and unpredictable ways. But our responsibility is to do what is right for those people over the long run. And the only way to do that is to open other markets to American products and services even as we open our markets to them.'"
What does this mean in practice?
(snip)
If trade and technology make us richer, then we can afford to help pay for health insurance and protect pensions forced to bear the cost. The hodge-podge of tax credits and "adjustment assistance" for workers who can link their job loss to imports isn't working; it needs an overhaul. And there is merit in what wonks call "wage insurance" that temporarily makes up some, though not all, of the gap between the wages of a lost job and those of a new one. This will be expensive, and needs to be designed to avoid turning healthy workers into taxpayer-supported couch potatoes. But the alternatives are costly too -- able-bodied but unskilled workers finagling their way onto disability rolls, families falling out of the middle class, cheering audiences for misguided politicians who shout that the only way for Americans to prosper is to keep Indians and Chinese in poverty.
Such programs are derided as "Band-Aids," and they are. The U.S. government also has to get the big things right. That means pushing China and others to stop bending trade rules or manipulating currencies and pressing Europe and Japan to get their people spending so the U.S. isn't always the consumer of last resort. It means setting U.S. taxes so they cover government spending at least in good times, rewriting perverse tax laws that encourage companies to invest elsewhere and managing the unquenchable American thirst for health care without giving employers new excuses not to hire.
(snip)
Write to David Wessel at capital@wsj.com
URL for this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB109831387480151274,00.html 
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
