Clark campaigns for anti-war vote on the BBC

[snyttri]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3186971.stm

[roughsatori]

1. I'm confused

I read the story and don't see anything about "campaigns for anti-war votes." I'm guessing that is your take on it. I think it is best when posting an article to post the actual title. I thought that was a rule since most follow it, but I don't think it is--but it is helpful in that it tends to give a more accurate reflection of the linked article.

[T_i_B]

2. I agree

The article is just reporting what Clark has said about the war on Iraq. Very little in there about any presidential ambitions Clark may have.

[snyttri]

5. My caption was meant to be humorous since there are no votes in Britain

I'll post a straighter caption next time to avoid confusion and make it easier for users to decide what they want to read.

[lebkuchen]

3. Clark is one of the first to admit the US had created chaos in Iraq

Strong comments, and accurate, but most don't want to admit it yet. Time and Newsweek have hinted at it on their latest covers, however.

Perle and Wolfie were on BBC quite often before "shock and awe." Most on the discussion panel--truly a democratic panel, not just representatives from the right, as is always seen in CNNI--and in the audience thought Perle and Wolfie were nuts. They just couldn't believe the indoctrination coming from their mouths.

I'm glad Clark is on the BBC scene to clean up after those two.

[MasonJar]

4. Bush and Clark

I support anyone who has the guts to tell it like it is...the more the merrier. However, if America elects this cabal again the rest of the world will know that we didn't care about being duped by the neo-cons. That will be the end to diplomacy. I want anyone or anything that can beat Bush; he is truly an idiot and an embarrassment. His cohorts are dangerous.