Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Slavery and Free trade

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
corporatewhore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 02:35 AM
Original message
Slavery and Free trade
Edited on Mon Feb-16-04 03:25 AM by corporatewhore
Al Sharpton brought up a very good point in tonights debate about nafta and slavery. americans said slavery was justified because of the economic dependency and people like Thomas jefferson said slavery was bad and should be ended...eventually. today People say the say thing about nafta/ftaa/wto/imf Your thoughts please (imho thats a 18th century cop out not suitable for the 21st century)
edited for clarity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
camero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 02:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Slavery and Employment
Both make human beings a commodity. I would compare NAFTA/GATT/WTO more to serfdom but it's not a wholly untrue comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreyV Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. Grow up children!
Grow up children, it's a competitive world out there. If you can't compete, produce both in quantity and quality, you will disappear as any meaningful market or economic force.

NAFTA and WTO were nice back in 90s while the upper and middle classes were getting richer, eh? Now that the profits have slowed down, it seems Americans don't want to play their own game. Game we started, and even claim to have invented it.. Or maybe we cant play it anymore. By game I mean good ole capitalism. Look at China.. they are the largest and most populous nation on earth, that happens to be quite communist. They are not taking the old Soviet route: "Yankees have built a bigger tank comrade, we must build bigger ones comrade!" They are not spending themselves into economic ruin by creating a largest defense budget this planet has seen. We are! Nope, they are beating us at our own game. Quite successfully I might add.

Yankee don't wanna play no more, eh?

Well America, you wanted it, you got it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 03:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. China?
India, perhaps, but China isn't in any kind of a position to threaten American dominance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreyV Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 03:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. India?
Edited on Mon Feb-16-04 03:24 AM by GreyV
You must be joking. India is always a step away from economic collapse. It's one big health catastrophe as well. Diseases that are virtually extinct still run rampant across India. Too many political branches/ideologies represented by dozens of national and local parties are always fighting each other and are creating political instability. And have been for the last 35 years. Fifth rate military that without its very small nuclear arsenal can be rendered useless by any modern and smaller military force doesn't help matters either. I mean MiG-21s are still considered viable by the Indian air force. MiG-21, whose origins date back to late 1940s. We are talking 60+ year old technology. Lets not forget that every attempt at military self-reliance has failed. Every project from new aircraft types to new small arms ventures have have failed. If it wasn't for Russia, who knows what awful state Indian military would be. What I am saying?! It is already seriously outdated and in awful state!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
david_vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 03:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Not exactly
Certain ideologues and lobbyists whose jobs will never be in jeopardy
wanted it, and were allowed to get it over the public interest. Don't try to pretend that Joe Sixpack was screaming for free trade because it's simply not true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. I didn't want it and I never supported NAFTA

so your categorical statements are out of place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mot78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 03:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. Makes sense to me
NAFTA is to sweat-shop, as the cotton kingdom was to plantations.

(Hey that makes a good SAT analogy!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corporatewhore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. that is a good analogy!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. From a moral standpoint,
Edited on Mon Feb-16-04 03:12 AM by girl gone mad
having child laborers working long hours in sweatshops earning pennies on the dollar so corporate stockholders can get richer is little better than being a slaveholder.

The argument that these children would be prostitutes or completely destitute if it weren't for the crappy jobs offered by Nike and The Gap is as tenuous as the argument that slavetraders used in the 18th century, that Africans were uncivilized and incapable of becoming civilized and were better off as slaves than living a tribal life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lostnote03 Donating Member (850 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. Predatorial Nature.....
....of Internatonal agreements with countrys that are attempting to bring their countrys into the modern world appear to be backlashing against us......I don't mind the thought of jobs being outsourced as long as our leaders are preparing our economy for the fallout which is obviously occuring....they haved failed it appears to prepare our society for the rollover effect here.....by that I mean our industrial engine is more geared to status quote as opposed to envigerated and dynamic change.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
11. We are just exporting the slavery to other countries.
Edited on Mon Feb-16-04 10:43 AM by revcarol
People to be held and worked in inhumane conditions that are unacceptable in any civilized country. Local politicos getting fat off the bribes given by the multi-nationals to move their capital there.

AND, HERE AT HOME, downward wage spiral caused by companies threatening to send their business overseas, which they generally do anyway a year or two after getting major wage and benefit concessions!! And people so desperate for anything to bring in money that they will work those minimum wage WalMart-type jobs, with no affordable health care and no benefits, just to keep their rent paid.

WAGE SLAVERY OR EXPORTED SLAVERY: two sides of the same coin.

And don't th;ink that just because one of the candidates(unnamed) wants to withdraw from NAFTA and forget about the WTO that this is going to fly. Withdrawing from NAFTA is illegal under the WTO.

And speaking of CHINA, IMHO it's a matter of national security that China, a nation that wishes us ill, holds so much of our national debt!!They could make our economy collapse in a NY minute if they sold this debt or wouldn't buy any more. Put that in your pipe and smoke it, "national security unnamed candidate!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
12. Locking
Rules to start discussion threads in the General Discussion forum.

...

7. Discussion topics that mention any or all of the Democratic presidential primary candidates are not permitted in the General Discussion forum, and instead must be posted in the General Discussion: 2004 Primary forum.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation,
DU moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC