Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If there is a draft will Libertarians serve?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Christ was Socialist Donating Member (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 04:49 PM
Original message
If there is a draft will Libertarians serve?
I am curious since they don't believe in public schools or civil services. I'm wondering will they be out during the riots/protests. I know a few who have the belief that the millitary should be 100% privatized, which when you think about it means alot more benifits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Momgonepostal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. There's a libertarian guy on a board I frequent....
...who thinks private militias would be a great job defending our country. Anyone else find the thought of a bunch of separate militias running around a bit frightening?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Christ was Socialist Donating Member (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm in the middle
If it means no forced job and over $80,000-$350,000 a year per troop i have no problem with it. Although i must admit Machiavelli ahd a point about mercenaries


snip---------------
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig3/tuccille5.html

CHAPTER XIII
Concerning Auxiliaries, Mixed Soldiery, And One's Own
AUXILIARIES, which are the other useless arm, are employed when a prince is called in with his forces to aid and defend, as was done by Pope Julius in the most recent times; for he, having, in the enterprise against Ferrara, had poor proof of his mercenaries, turned to auxiliaries, and stipulated with Ferdinand, King of Spain, for his assistance with men and arms. These arms may be useful and good in themselves, but for him who calls them in they are always disadvantageous; for losing, one is undone, and winning, one is their captive.

And although ancient histories may be full of examples, I do not wish to leave this recent one of Pope Julius II, the peril of which cannot fall to be perceived; for he, wishing to get Ferrara, threw himself entirely into the hands of the foreigner. But his good fortune brought about a third event, so that he did not reap the fruit of his rash choice; because, having auxiliaries routed at Ravenna, and the Switzers having risen and driven out the conquerors (against all expectation, both his and others), it so came to pass that he did not become prisoner to his enemies, they having fled, nor to his auxiliaries, he having conquered by other arms than theirs.

The Florentines, being entirely without arms, sent ten thousand Frenchmen to take Pisa, whereby they ran more danger than at any other time of their troubles.

The Emperor of Constantinople, to oppose his neighbours, sent ten thousand Turks into Greece, who, on the war being finished, were not willing to quit; this was the beginning of the servitude of Greece to the infidels.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You actually should have a problem with it
Edited on Thu Apr-22-04 06:28 PM by camero
It's not without its downside. Private armies are not constrained by the US Constitution and only go after the almighty buck. I think the ban on quartering of soldiers in people's homes may be the next right to go down with private armies along with the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sean From Tampa Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Libertarians say they oppose a draft
It's one of the things I like about them.

I almost became one myself in college because I share their views about individual liberty. Like me, they oppose gun control, support drug legalization, oppose military conscription and think any laws restricting consensual behavior between adults (i.e. state anti-sodomy laws, anti-polygamy laws) are wrong.

I share very few of their economic views, however, but I was willing to overlook that because I share their views on personal liberty.

The trouble is, when I went to one of their meetings, all their talk was about "economic freedom," which means the same to them as the Repukes.

In fact, I didn't hear a single thing about the problems with our drug laws, our gun laws, or how a woman's right to choose was in danger from the right. The whole meeting was taken over by Repukes who left their party in disgust because they didn't think Reagan went far enough in deregulating every facet of the economy.

Needless to say, I stayed a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC