|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
grasswire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-03-04 10:22 PM Original message |
*'s first words on hearing of the WTC attack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-03-04 10:23 PM Response to Original message |
1. never... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oblivious (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-03-04 10:33 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. He didn't want to frighten the children by leaving early. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-03-04 10:40 PM Response to Reply #5 |
14. Kids have been scarred for life |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boxster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-03-04 10:41 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. Well, I guess he wanted to "leave no child behind", |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobendorfer (429 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-03-04 11:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
19. I take it as self-evident |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-04 12:02 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. great! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boxster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-03-04 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. I've never understood this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malatesta1137 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-03-04 10:29 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Bush knew the attacks were coming. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Austin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-03-04 10:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Heck, even if it had been an accident, that's a huge thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boxster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-03-04 10:38 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. Agreed. Maybe he was doped up.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zen Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-03-04 10:34 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. The question remains .. Why wasn't NORAD notified? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boxster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-03-04 10:40 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. The Pentagon crash is the most inexplicable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-03-04 10:44 PM Response to Reply #2 |
16. Okay, I had to look it up LIHOP... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlavesandBulldozers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-03-04 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
7. it didn't matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zen Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-03-04 10:36 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. No, Richard Clarke was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Austin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-03-04 10:37 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Well, actually, according to Richard Clarke's book |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bush_Eats_Beef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-03-04 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
10. But what would Bush gain by sitting back and letting this happen, he asked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-03-04 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
12. even if it wasn't LIHOP... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zen Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-03-04 10:47 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. At the minimum a circumstantial case can be made for LIHOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-03-04 11:35 PM Response to Original message |
18. what's inexplicable is this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Digit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-04 12:18 AM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Good point n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 02:57 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC