Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

*'s first words on hearing of the WTC attack

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 10:22 PM
Original message
*'s first words on hearing of the WTC attack
Q: What were the first words President George Bush spoke upon hearing that his nation was under attack?

A: "That's exactly right. These are great readers. Very impressive. Thank you all so much for showing me your reading skills. I bet they practice too, don't you. Reading more than they watch TV? You guys do that? Read more than you watch TV? Oh that's great. Very good. Very important to practice. Very impressive. Very impressive."

(Uttered five minutes after Andy Card whispered in his ear.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. never...
....never never forget this moment of infamy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. He didn't want to frighten the children by leaving early.
That's the only excuse I've ever heard for this, and it's been drilled into the masses so they parrot it whenever it comes up. Unbelievable, that they can't think it through, how absolutely absurd this sounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Kids have been scarred for life
by the words, "Oops, gotta run now -- your teacher will finish the story with you."

I don't know how anybody can even pretend it makes any sense!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boxster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Well, I guess he wanted to "leave no child behind",
even during a terrorist attack.

:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobendorfer Donating Member (429 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. I take it as self-evident
That if you can't figure out how to extract yourself
from a classroom full of 6-year olds in the event of
a national emergency, you probably shouldn't be
President.

But I am told I have high standards.

J.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. great!
LOL

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boxster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. I've never understood this.
Edited on Mon May-03-04 10:26 PM by boxster
I will never understand why a terrorist attack on the US was met with such nonchalance.

I don't buy into the LIHOP conspiracy theories, but Bush either a) is a complete idiot, b) knew that someone else would deal with it, or c) knew it was going to happen.

None of those choices is acceptable. He's the POTUS, for God's sake. He should have had his ass on a plane and been "in charge" about five minutes after Card notified him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malatesta1137 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Bush knew the attacks were coming.
He knew before he entered the school. There's no question about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Heck, even if it had been an accident, that's a huge thing
and you'd think he'd jump up to go look at the TV!

What I don't get is that he didn't even say to Andy Card "What did you say?", "Huh?", "You're kidding!" or any of the things a normal person would say upon being told some bad news.

I'll just never understand that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boxster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Agreed. Maybe he was doped up....
Though, you'd have to be seriously out of it not to react to something as monumental as this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. The question remains .. Why wasn't NORAD notified?
All the regular protocol that automatically goes into gear when a plane alters its flight plan (as in the Payne Stewart plane) DID NOT HAPPEN ON 9/11. No one has yet explained this. The military jets weren't scrambled, NORAD wasn't notified for half an hour, everything that should have happened, didn't.

And Bush sat in the little chair and read about a little goat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boxster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. The Pentagon crash is the most inexplicable.
There's an AFB minutes away, and they had plenty of notice. Nothing happened.

And, we're supposed to believe that Bush was concerned about terrorism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Okay, I had to look it up LIHOP...
... Let It Happen On Purpose Theory. Here's a link, I'm sure there are many more:


http://www.halexandria.org/dward250.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. it didn't matter
President Cheney was in Washington calling the shots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. No, Richard Clarke was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Well, actually, according to Richard Clarke's book
Clarke was calling the shots while Condi, Cheney and the Missus were hustled off to the White House bunker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. But what would Bush gain by sitting back and letting this happen, he asked
Rove: Republicans Benefit from War Credentials
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/DailyNews/Rove_020118.html



"A U S T I N, Texas, Jan.18 — Using unusually pointed language, President Bush's chief political adviser Karl Rove suggested Republicans should run on the message that they are the party who can be trusted to successfully fight the war against terrorism."

"We can also go to the country on this issue because they trust the Republican Party to do a better job of protecting and strengthening America's military might and thereby protecting America," Rove said."

"Over a carb-heavy lunch at the Republican National Committee's winter meeting in Austin, Rove spelled out the GOP election message for November: "Win the war, protect the homeland, and revive the economy."

"By keeping the public prepared for a long war, the president keeps up the necessary emotional and practical support the effort requires, but it has a political benefit too, as Bush's popularity and war-time mantle can be extended into this election year and maybe into 2004, when Bush's respected national security team could serve as actual or virtual surrogates in a possible Bush re-election effort."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. even if it wasn't LIHOP...
...Bush was TOTALLY unprepared to assume command. He had a script to follow and no one had yet told him how to deviate from it, so he stuck to the script.

Bush's political campaigns have been lauded for their ability to "stay on message." In part I think this is simply because Bush is not capable of thinking outside of his script. Notice that whenever he's goaded into trying, he makes an utter fool of himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. At the minimum a circumstantial case can be made for LIHOP
since it's now known that Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, et al were plotting to go to war with Iraq from DAY ONE -- and as soon as 9/11 happened they ran with it, putting the emphasis on Saddam rather than Osama. Saddam was captured. Osama's still out there. Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
18. what's inexplicable is this...
...the Secret Service stood down from their normal protocol. They picked up Cheney and moved him, physically. Nobody moved a muscle to save George from attack. Nobody did a thing, despite the fact that his location was beamed live to the whole world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Digit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Good point n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC