Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Arnold actually say he voted for Prop 187?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 09:37 PM
Original message
Did Arnold actually say he voted for Prop 187?
Did he actually say that? If so, why would be that stupid? Didn't the backlash against Prop 187 result in the GOP being frozen out of every statewide offce in 2002 and all but two in 1998? What is he thinking? With Cruz Bustamente in the race now I see Arnold losing the support of key Hispanic voters. Or will saying he supported Prop 187 bring back voters who may be supporting Simon, Uberoth, or McClintock?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Two points...
Somebody from his campaign, I think Pete Wilson (!) said it. I don't know if the word was "voted for" or "supported." This is important, because more often than not Arnie doesn't bother to vote. He thinks that is for someone else to do I guess... But it's been said firmly now that he supports 187.

So now we have a crucial weapon in this fight to add to our arsenal. There's no way he could "clarify" what was said without losing a lot of credibility with the press...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ok
Yeah that was big mistake on Arnold's part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hispanics Voting for Ahhhnuld?
The Hispanics who think he's cool would be adolescents who can't vote and think it's not cool to vote.

Who IS Ahhhnuld's constituency? I don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orangecoloredapple Donating Member (290 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. I've lived in the southwest all my life and singe my butt, but
I agree with denying social services to illegal immigrants. Note I said illegal immigrants. Not hispanic immigrants. All illegal immigrants. We can talk til we're lavender in the face about the childrens needs, etc, but the fact remains that they are illegally residing in this country. I cohabitate with someone who is 5th generation hispanic american - still speaks spanish, and agrees with me. Most hispanics that have been in this country legally for many years or decades have a strong negative feeling about the illegal immigration problem. They feel they have done things the legal and correct way, as have other ethnic group for generations, and do not believe the influx of illegal people is helping this country one whit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Here is what I think
Denying services to the parents is one thing. But children shouldn't suffer for the mistakes of their parents. So I think you need to strike a balance there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. Here is the thing about that particular version
fortunately it was ruled unconstitutional. But supporters wanted it this way.

SCHOOLS (teachers, administrators, even clerical) - had to report ANYCHILD they "Suspected" might be illegal to the INS within 60 days - or they (the school personnel) would face legal consequences.

Medical personal - - had to report ANYCHILD they "Suspected" might be illegal to the INS within 60 days - or they (the school personnel) would face legal consequences.

SO - now - education and service providers had to become INS operatives - or face legal consequences.

WHile it was struck down, at least initially it drove all sorts of families - even legal ones for fear of any problems - from seeking services. That means preventive care isn't given. That means near emergency care isn't given. That means kids don't go to school. That means even emergency care might be avoided. For many folks this = legal aliens - many are afraid of the INS - due to rumor/horror stories.

At the time just after its passage I worked with a number of schools that were multiracial - kids were harassing other kids by tagging them as "illegals" - it got very, very ugly.

It was a particularly bad piece of legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. His campaign said he voted for it.
snip>
Arnold Schwarzenegger's campaign said Sunday that the actor had voted for Proposition 187, the divisive 1994 ballot measure to deny social services to illegal immigrants, offering a glimpse at one of his policy stances.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2003/08/10/state1930EDT0082.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. What a dumb move
That's all I can say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Remember, he doesn't need 50% + 1
of the vote. He's obviously signalling to the far right that he's one of them. I'm surprised you didn't catch onto why he said this, Carlos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I did catch on
I think it was meant to take votes away from McClintock, Uberoth, and Simon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. Why support it?
He is a real right-winger...he's playing a populist game right now.

That's in my O

I want to vote for Cruz, but if she can impress me, I'm leaning toward Arianna.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Vote for the Democrat who can beat Arnold!
I like Arianna, but Cruz can win, Arianna probably can't.

Don't you want to support someone who can actually win?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
12. Choosing Pete Wilson as his "spokesman" sends a pretty clear message

My favorite Pete moment was when the doctors had to explain to him that refusing to vaccinate children from other countries against communicable diseases would not really be a good idea.

Although the plan to expel all the kids from school and turn them loose in the streets all day was pretty good too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
13. LOL - as a pro-gay & pro-choice candidate
he has permanently alienated the religious right, so coming out in support of this unconstitutional measure does nothing to help him. It only further alienates the lefties and minorties. It also makes him look like a total idiot.

"Hey, I'm not so liberal - I voted for an unconstitutional immigrant-bashing measure!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. You're just "playing the race card"!
Someone in Arnold's campaign already said that mentioning Arnold's admitted support of 187 is "playing the race card".

Actually trying to throw immigrant kids out of school and deny them medical care isn't "playing the race card", but pointing out that someone voted yes on an unconstitutional law that was an indirect attack on minorities is.

The media will probably go along with Arnold's position too. Let's not "play the race card" by looking at Arnold's positions on important issues. Let's talk about his movies instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Ya, attempting to turn teachers and medical professionals
into INS agents (they were to report ANY "SUSPECTED" illegal child/family to INS within 60 days or face legal consequences) = playing the race card. Sure Ahnald.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
15. I'm Suprised Arnold Doesn't
see the irony of supporting Prop 187.

After all, he wasn't born in California either.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
18. Question II
So will this cause a backlash from Latino voters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. At the least
I think it will neutralize the glam/macho effect of his persona. As in he might lose as many as he gains just because he is who he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC