|
was discussing the NeoCon strategy in Iraq, etc. He described PNAC as a bunch of rabid idealists who are so enamored of their "plan" that they are unable to make realistic judgments. That was the first explanation of this insanity that makes any sense. The concept of "fuzzy headed idealist" has been used to label radical left-wingers for so long, it never occurred to me to apply it to the right. (Since the term was coined by the right, I should have suspected.) But if you look and PNAC / BFEE in terms of a group burning with zeal in their moral and intellectual superiority, such that they believe they are incapable of making a mistake, all this insanity makes some kind of twisted sense.
My winger brother took great pains to explain how he was undeniably my moral superior, but at the time, I just blew it off as stupidity. Is this part of the indoctrination?
A Heritage Foundation talking head and a couple of right-wing apologist journalists got all frothy mouthed about his statement, thus validating his claim. It was an eye opening experience.
"Never attribute to maliciousness that which can be explained by stupidity." -- Anonymous
Anyone catch the introduction to this piece? I'd love to learn more about this guys ideas.
|