An editorial appeared in our paper (the Orlando Slantinel) that discusses Peruvian politics and the current US trade talks (registration required). Certain words caught my eye making, me wonder just what's going on, and WHAT THE US INVOLVEMENT in their politics has been:
Peruvian politics vex U.S. trade talksBy Terry L. McCoy | Special to the Sentinel
Posted May 24, 2004
LIMA, Peru -- The United States is conducting talks with Peru and its Andean neighbors, Colombia and Ecuador, to create a free-trade bloc. Negotiating a trade agreement with the world's largest, most advanced economy should be cause for celebration. Instead, the visitor finds this country on the Pacific coast of South America mired in self-doubt.
Peruvian angst is in large part a product of a chronically unsettled political situation. With rich mineral resources to sell on booming global-commodity markets, Peru's economy is performing well. But the 26 million citizens of Peru have not been able to arrive at a political formula that would allow their nation to realize its full economic potential. Political discontent persists despite the fact that Peru is better off today by most measures than at any time in its history.
<snip>
Populist President Alan Garcia, who served 1985-1990, compounded Peru's troubles by pursuing irresponsible economic policies that triggered runaway inflation and bankrupted the economy. After completing his term, Garcia fled Peru to avoid arrest on corruption charges.
Peru's apparent salvation came from an unexpected source. Little-known,
politically independent Alberto Fujimori won a surprising victory in the 1990 presidential election, and was re-elected in 1995. Fujimori restored the country's economic health by
adopting the free-market policies promoted by the international financial community.<snip>
And as president, Toledo has implemented orthodox economic policies that have restored growth over the past three years while keeping inflation under control and the national currency strong.
<more>