Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Bush really say yesterday that it was "just a domestic problem"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Brotherjohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-03 08:58 AM
Original message
Did Bush really say yesterday that it was "just a domestic problem"?
... one that "didn't require White House input"??

If someone has a link to this quote, or a transcript, please post it! Yesterday, there was a thread or two about Ted Koppel reporting this on ABC, with somewhat derisive sarcsam, apparently because he couldn't believe Bush would say this.

If he did, then apparently Karl and Dick sat him down for a good talking to, because he seemed to have a lot to say about it later. (http://abcnews.go.com/wire/Politics/ap20030815_105.html)

For the record, though, I fully believe that the "domestic" quote WAS his initial response. It just fits his M.O. The moran probably doesn't even understand the difference between "domestic" and "regional" (which is what he probably meant), or that a silly little "regional" problem like a blackout affecting tens of millions across several states and two countries might merit some "White House input".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
StopTheMorans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-03 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. not to hijack your thread, but since you brought up Koppel
Edited on Fri Aug-15-03 09:09 AM by stoptheinsandity
just a promising scenario I saw last night re: Dan Rather. He kept questioning the field reporters in San Diego and DC saying "where is Bush?", "will he go ahead with his campaign fundraiser at a time like this", "where is cheney", "why is the chief of staff the one responsible for addressing the public", etc... These aren't his exact quotes, but they caught the mood, and it really came across as if Brokaw was slamming the white house for being away on vacation and completely ignoring the situation:) Very promising:)

on edit: named wrong talking head:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DagmarK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-03 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It was Dan Rather who was asking those questions......
Edited on Fri Aug-15-03 09:07 AM by DagmarK
and the most hilarious thing he said was about Cheney......

And cheney, the last we heard from him he was on vacation....... (something thereabouts). Cracked me up big time! The network dudes and dudettes probably joke around just like us about Cheney being in continual hiding in an undisclosed location somewhere on this earth.....

LOL

But since you say you SAW this on NBC news.....was Brokaw saying things along the same lines? Wow...that's coordination! (or are you mixing up brokaw and rather maybe?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StopTheMorans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-03 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. D'OH!!!!!!!!!!
I should know that, the only one of the talking newsheads I ever watch is Dan Rather:) Thanks for the correction:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-03 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Dan Rather on Cheney's vacation
as quoted here at DU, Rather said "Cheney is on vacation, which we all need from time to time." :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MooPie Donating Member (397 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-03 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. I went to the abc link and noticed
that they didn't give *'s entire quote. He said "We'll have time to look at it and determine whether or not our grid needs to be modernized." They left off the rest of the sentence which is "I happen to think it does, and have said so all along." Total bushit. Go to http://www.buzzflash.com/analysis/03/08/15_blackout.html
and read how in June of 2001 he opposed and GOP voted down legislation to modernize the power grid.
Sorry, don't know how to make the link work for you. I'm new at this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brotherjohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-03 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. That's pretty damning. Lying again. Repubs were against modernizing...
... the grid. Straight party line, all the way. And not just because the $600M aid to the poor was thrown in (we know they hate that). The specific amendment regarding modernization of the grid through loans was voted down in committe on a party line vote.

Democrats should bring this up throughout Election 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StopTheMorans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-03 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. yes!
the dems should bring this up as a huge campaign issue for 2004. They could tie this in with Enron too, how the pukes just wanted to deregulate so that their corporate buddies in the energy field could afford platinum harnesses for their polo ponies while the great unwashed have to go without power and get hung up in cities overnight. Shrubco=Pure, unadulterated EVIL:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackstraw45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-03 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Another LIE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-03 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Hi MooPie!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VoteClark Donating Member (775 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-03 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. That sounds like Bush
The Bush family has a hard time realizing that they are President of the United States. Not President of the World, or Iraq, or the Middle East. So Domestic Issues are never of their concern.


:kick:
J4Clark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-03 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. I despise Bush*, but I can't help thinking that he was using the word
"domestic" as in "enemies, foreign or domestic". Probably he just wanted to say it wasn't foreigners. Problem is, that leaves us wondering if the "domestic" was referring to enemies/terrorism--which he probably didn't mean to imply. Did he? Hmmm. The more I try to figure out what he could have meant, the harder it gets to see it as anything but major bumbling.

Still, I think one can't rule out that he no longer cares (if he ever did care) about what happens in the US, being so self-importantly concerned with spreading democracy abroad. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-03 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
9. Call WH at 202-456-1111 or e-mail president@whitehouse.gov
...if you want to call Bush on his claim that he wanted to modernize the grid.

It's the same old story. The administration will call for billions on unproven and/or ineffective weapons that do not guarantee our safety, yet stiff state, local and federal government when it comes to spending that might actually prevent or deal with a crisis. This is madness, and we're going to pay for it in one fashion or another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-03 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. gee
Govt SPENDING $$$ on INFRASTRUCTURE is usually a BOOST to an economy. TOO BAD THE PRICK din't think of THAT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC