|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
DaveSZ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 11:19 AM Original message |
Clarence Thomas favors re-enslaving himself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaveSZ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
1. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leyton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 11:25 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. I'm curious... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 12:10 PM Response to Reply #4 |
20. His conclusions are correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leyton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 12:44 PM Response to Reply #20 |
30. How do you get from 'raw language' to slavery? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleApple81 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
2. Amazing heading, DaveSZ... gets to the heart of the issue. GO backwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leyton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
3. Subject line is misleading... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 11:27 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. There is nothing in the full article about slavery either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qazplm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 12:30 PM Response to Reply #6 |
28. cmon guys |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaveSZ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 11:29 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Thomas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleApple81 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 11:36 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. I got your point immediately. And I am glad I interpreted it correctly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MUSTANG_2004 (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 11:41 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Horsefeathers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 11:50 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Strict constructionist? lol- another term that has no real meaning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NormanConquest (346 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 12:13 PM Response to Reply #15 |
23. John Dean's definition of a "strict constructionist": |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qazplm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 11:55 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. if he is a strict constructionists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 12:06 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Supposedly, "strict constructionists" need direct textual |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leyton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 12:41 PM Response to Reply #17 |
29. You misrepresent strict constructionism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 01:07 PM Response to Reply #29 |
35. if they don't believe in the "Incorporation Doctrine" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qazplm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 01:43 PM Response to Reply #29 |
37. with all due respect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 12:13 PM Response to Reply #13 |
22. Yeah right....lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
5. thomas should be a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olddem43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 01:04 PM Response to Reply #5 |
33. He couldn't do that either - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiphopnation (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
7. from what I understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
candy331 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 11:35 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. He is just a large part of the disease in America. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaveSZ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 11:38 AM Original message |
You could call it taking poetic license. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
24. I agree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bushwakker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 11:38 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. A limerick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaveSZ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 11:40 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Here are the Freepers' thoughts on this article (for balance): |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
14. "Original intent" is just a smokescreen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
16. While I am not a scholar on Supreme Court Judges... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaveSZ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 11:58 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Thomas' views on torture: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 12:24 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. Unbelievable... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
21. Woke up to that in my morning paper the other day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaveSZ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 12:24 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 12:29 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. Hey!...Long time no see... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 12:46 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. Haha...you would have gotten to read me the other day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 01:05 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. LOL... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donsu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
32. what I want to know is how Limbaugh and Thomas got so chummy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 01:46 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. Maybe Limbaugh knew he was going to get his butt handed to him... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
I thought so. (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
36. Thomas and Scalia are Opus Dai. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MisterP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-04 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
39. Coca-Cola, anyone? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC