|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
stilladeaniac (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-12-04 03:40 PM Original message |
Bet gone awry...Please Help |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOPisEvil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-12-04 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
1. In 1991? I believe it was the 4th largest army in the world. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wryter2000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-12-04 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
2. Welcome to DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SonofMass (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-12-04 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
3. Tell him you were betting that the average size per soldier |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trotsky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-12-04 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
4. I have a hard time believing that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stilladeaniac (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-12-04 06:06 PM Response to Reply #4 |
20. He googled "largest iraq army" and showed me a few links n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-12-04 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
5. Hate to tell you this, but you lost your bet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shoelace414 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-12-04 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
6. I remember hearing that statistic back in 1991 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meegbear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-12-04 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
7. Dude, you owe me ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tempest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-12-04 03:54 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. Great job, Meegbear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RichV (858 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-12-04 03:55 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. Wow, interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stilladeaniac (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-12-04 06:02 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. The word used was "Army" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stilladeaniac (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-12-04 06:00 PM Response to Reply #7 |
17. HELL YEAH! Thanks!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-12-04 06:14 PM Response to Reply #7 |
21. Very good find... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-12-04 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
8. It was......(nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troublemaker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-12-04 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
9. You're not going to be happy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wurzel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-12-04 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
10. May be largest in numbers of soldiers. But badly equipped. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobthedrummer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-12-04 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
11. Your co-worker won your $10-in 1991 Iraq was the 4th largest army |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MsFlorida (370 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-12-04 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
12. 8th does seem more reasonable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-12-04 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
13. WAR CRIMES - Highway of Death |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-12-04 06:18 PM Response to Reply #13 |
22. I had never seen this before. . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gothmog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-12-04 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
16. I remember this stat also but thought it referred to # of tanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-12-04 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
19. I think it's a wash |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC