Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OMFG !!! - Destroying the National Guard

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-26-04 11:52 PM
Original message
OMFG !!! - Destroying the National Guard
<snip>

The unit knew it would soon be shipped to the front. Some soldiers responded by deserting. Others got drunk and fought. In response, officers locked the unit in its barracks, allowing the troops out only to drill, not even to smoke a cigarette, until it could be put on the transport that would take it into combat.

It sounds as if I am describing some third echelon Soviet infantry regiment in, say, 1942. In fact, I am talking about the 1st Battalion of the 178th Field Artillery Regiment, South Carolina National Guard, in September 2004. According to a front-page story in the Sept. 19 Washington Post, the unit was disintegrating even before it was deployed to Iraq. One shudders to think what will happen once it gets there and finds itself under daily attack from skilled enemies it cannot identify.

And...

Yes, the Guard was mobilized and deployed overseas in both World Wars, but those were true national wars, in which the American people were all involved one way or another. Cabinet wars, as they used to be called, are something altogether different. As Frederick the Great said, cabinet wars must be waged in such a manner that the people do not know they are going on. But National Guardsmen are the people. To send them into a cabinet war is to misuse them in a way that will destroy them. Even in the American Revolution, militiamen were seldom asked to fight outside their own state. When they were, they usually responded by deserting.

And...

For many Guardsmen, deployment to Iraq means economic ruin. They have mortgage payments, car payments, credit card debt, all calculated on their civilian salaries. Suddenly, for a year or more, their pay drops to that of a private. The families they leave behind face the loss of everything they have. What militia wouldn't desert in that situation?

<snip>

Link: http://www.antiwar.com/lind/?articleid=3651

Link to WaPo Story: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A31689-2004Sep18.html

GOD FUCKING DAMMIT!!!

:nuke:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-26-04 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. And From The WaPo Story...
<snip>

This Guard unit was put on an accelerated training schedule -- giving the soldiers about 36 hours of leave over the past two months -- because the Army needs to get fresh troops to Iraq, and there are not enough active-duty or "regular" troops to go around. Preparation has been especially intense because the Army is short-handed on military police units, so these artillerymen are being quickly re-trained to provide desperately needed security for convoys. And to fully man the unit, scores of soldiers were pulled in from different Guard outfits, some voluntarily, some on orders.

<snip>

Link above.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigone382 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. God, it's so sad
When will the sheeple open up their eyes?

What's more, all of this points to one thing looming on the horizon: the draft. And we all know the only way to stop that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WLKjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. When MP's come to thier house
to haul thier asses off to fight. Then we will see a yellow streak run up thier backsides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carla in Ca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. We are a train wreck
and only Senator Kerry has his hand on the brake. It stops Nov. 3rd.

I also read today that for the FIRST time ever, the Pentagon will be collecting all the soldier's ballots. Rumsfeld has promised that all will be sent to the appropriate states.
What is going on here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelYell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. A promise from Rumsfeld
is like, "the check's in the mail."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NinetySix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. LINK, please!
I'd really like to read that article. That's about damn sinister.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carla in Ca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. It was a comment on another site
I will find it...very important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Here's a start
Rumsfeld is directly responsible for all overseas votes, as appointed by Shrub under something called the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA).

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=835525
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carla in Ca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. I just finished reading all 64 posts
and quite a few also asked for a link to her assertions but she never did post again. My fault, sorry. I should get a link to prove these comments.
I googled it and this is as close as I get
<http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/31/opinion/31tues1.html?ex=1096430400&en=e61dc321bf881a88&ei=5070>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. Terrible huh? Yeah, this story was popular on LBN last week.
Edited on Mon Sep-27-04 12:07 AM by Mr_Spock
I even repeated it to people I talk to daily - it's really a sign of the times and when people openly go AWOL and cause problems - you know the amount of discontent underneath it all is very high. This whole episode was just so poorly conceived by AWOL coward in the WH - it's almost like he's making up for his failures as a youth at the expense of these young kids (and the nation as a whole). What a waste of money and lives - what a disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
11. The bottom line: Bu$h and the neocons want to destroy America....
that's it...what else is there to say?

I would hope this would be obvious to any sane person by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. Kick !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redleg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. Things are fucked up when Redlegs get used as convoy guards
and as foot-patrols. Not that we artillerymen aren't up to humping a ruck and patrolling when needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC