Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How can Kerry RAISE SPENDING and RAISE TAXES?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
dumpster_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 11:42 AM
Original message
How can Kerry RAISE SPENDING and RAISE TAXES?
They is a recent thread with the title of "How will Kerry cut spending?". Well, call me paranoid, but I call that thread an instance of some rightwinger trying to frame the debate. They have been doing that for decades. Don't let them get away with it!

Frame the debate as "How can Kerry Raise Taxes on the wealthy so that we can raise social spending on healthcare?"

Now, how about some suggestions as to how Kerry can sell a big tax increase on the upper income group? So that all working class Americans can have healthcare!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rogerashton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Green taxes
Tax polluters, not employees. This is a tax that does two jobs at the same time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Or, in short, TAX THE RICH
Edited on Mon Sep-27-04 12:21 PM by Cronus
I think Robin Hood had it right.

"So I don't worry about, and people shouldn't
worry about a draft. . . I think we're in good
shape, I really do. And, if not, we'll -- I'll address
the nation
. But I don't see any need to right now."

- G. W. Bush (Source: The Whitehouse)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Wally Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Since we have defined the rich..........
Here in DU, the rich are defined as only those persons making over $225,000 a year. If we raise their marginal tax rate from 35% to, say, 40%, how many dollars will that bring in each year??

Is the purpose of taxes to raise money to fund the government or is it to punish the rich??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RivetJoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. That is NOT rich!
where did that figure come from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Wally Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Another thread on here.
It was bruited about on another thread as the level where the top rate should be imposed. Over $225K is the top 0.9% of the taxpayers. If you only want to go after folks making $1M a year or more, that is a really small tax base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dumpster_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. $225K IS rich
JMHO....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RivetJoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. It's not
JMIO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UdoKier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Raising Spending on Healthcare" - failure of rhetoric.
It should be repeatedly referred to as a "REDUCTION OF COST".

Single-payer systems, in EVERY country where they are used, have an overall cost only a FRACTION of what we pay here. I'd be happy to pay a hundred dollar monthly "tax" to the gov't, if it saved me $200 in health care premiums.

I know Kerry's plan is not single-payer, but I should hope that's the eventual goal...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dumpster_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. good point--we need to start a propaganda offensive
to rehabilitate taxation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. "How can Bush Raise Spending and Cut Taxes?"
That should be the real question Americans should be asking themselves...

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UdoKier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Why?
The top rate is at an historic low:

http://liberalindex.org/top-rates-graph.php

If anything, it should be raised AT LEAST to where it was under Clinton, and more regressive taxes should be loweered somewhat to relieve the burden on working people.

I hate the term "tax cut" because it seems to ALWAYS be referring to a cut for the super-rich.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UdoKier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Another look at the plummeting tax burden on the rich...
Edited on Tue Sep-28-04 12:37 AM by UdoKier


and look where household income has gone...



And look how the rich fare when you figure in ALL taxes.

Talk about a flat tax? We're practically already there!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Still_Notafraid Donating Member (304 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
12. You don't even want the real taxes
The real tax is the cost of living,Imagine having to turn over our bureaus to private corporations because we don't have enough tax revenue coming in to support them which is the plan of most republican think tanks.

Do you want to privatize your public schools,water systems,highways,social security,and countless other important government programs relying on tax revenue to operate. I don't because it raises the cost of living corporations who are concerned with profit are not going to practice price control.Don't give the needs of the many in the hands of the unethical few.

As far as the how much money is going to come in by reversing the tax cuts on the top 6% its going to be around 850 billion according to Kerry in one of his speeches,which is about right considering Bush's tax cut was 1.6 trillion.I don't mind paying the taxes i paid under Clinton I love America and will do whats best for her if fair tax rate is good for America its good for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC