Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So how exactly did the flu vaccines get contaminated?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 01:02 AM
Original message
So how exactly did the flu vaccines get contaminated?
I've seen/heard all of the hype about not having enough, how Bush was warned three years ago about the danger, etc. But how, exactly, did these get contaminated? What is a "major mechanical" error?

Okay...tinfoil here. But when I hear this stuff I'm thinking about the bio-terror scientists that have been dieing off since this administration and...well, how did this happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bushy flicked a booger into the main processing vat
Probably not, but it's got serious comedic possibilites.

--bkl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. LOL!!! Thanks for the visual!
*running to bathroom*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe they put the vaccine in tanker trucks in Iraq?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. England has higher standards. THey warned the company &
the US said not a problem. Later the British said "We warned you" and closed them down. WE have another vaccine company also making the vaccine but, if our standards are too low for the British, are they okay for us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. The problem is deregulation
This is one detail that has been completely glossed over. This problme is a direct result of deregulation. If the company was forced to comply with stricter inspections and manufacturing standards, they probably wouldn't have even had a contamination problem in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barney Rocks Donating Member (746 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. yeah--I
really would like to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 03:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. strange, isn't it
they don't explain and no one apparently is asking them to explain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Yes, I've been waiting for details on it
Nothing like an in-depth review. Instead, we're spending time on more important things like Kerry speaking French and poor Laura being maligned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. John Edwards and the Trial Lawyers Did it
at least Bush keeps blaiming them - because somehow trial lawyers, who sue companies for things like contaminated vaccines, caused vaccine manufacturers to go out of business or to be afraid to make vaccines. . . .hence, the vaccine is contaminated because of John Edwards, Trial Laywers, and the Liberal Allies of John Kerry.

I still haven't figured out the logic of this, but that is what GWB seems to be selling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. What logic?
As long as he can point the finger at an opponent, he fires away like a machine gun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dirtyduck Donating Member (274 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. It's still bull b/c vaccine makers have liability exemptions
Beyond that, who wants contaminated vaccines?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
8. The vaccine is grown in chicken eggs, and some of the eggs used
at some point had other bacteria in it, and the whole lot of it gets contaminated. I wouldn't describe it as a mechanical type of error, rather I guess not enough quality control on the raw materials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. That's the best explanation
I've seen on it. I mis-spoke with 'mechanical'...when I checked he said "major manufacturing defect". Still, it didn't really explain any details. Thanks. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dirtyduck Donating Member (274 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. and why chicken eggs?
Couldn't we find a better way? I deal with this all the time b/c my daughter is allergic to eggs and thus can't get the vaccine if I wanted her to. It just seems to me we could find a better way to make it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. A better way? Sure! Who'd pay for it?
The pharmacological companies can make more money inventing yet another drug to put lead into pencils.

If the government weren't blowing billions on unnecessary wars & stupid tax cuts, funds could be directed to worthwhile projects like this. Those fact that approximately 30,000 die every year from the flu are unsettling. Even in "good" years, too many people are unprotected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greekspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
9. Maybe Shrub pissed in it like he pisses on Americans?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
10. Follow the money, I suspect. If they can now ask $150.00 for a shot,
I would imagine it payed off well for someone. Makes an excellent distraction, don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. You may have a point.
It seems Bush is telling us all of the money went to the trial lawyers so it's their fault. *whiplash*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
15. Dead baby fell into the vat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
16. Chiron found some bacterial contamination in August
claimed it was isolated and the vaccine would be OK; the British agency inspected the plant in late September, and on Oct 5th said the manufacturing process gave them concerns of contamination, and so suspended the licence;
On October 8, the FDA team met with senior leadership of Chiron. Chiron presented the key results of their investigation, including negative retesting of all other lots, and indicated that they believed that the results, which they had planned to submit to the FDA, supported their conclusion that the contamination problem was confined to a limited number of lots identified by their testing.

On October 9, the FDA inspection team traveled from London to Liverpool and met with 2 MHRA inspectors, who joined the team as observers.

On October 10, the team initiated the inspection at the Chiron facility in Liverpool.

On October 15, FDA completed its investigation and presented its list of inspectional observations to Chiron's management as part of the close -out meeting that is held at the end of every FDA inspection. During that meeting, FDA investigators explained and discussed the observations that were documented during the inspection. FDA's inspection found significant deficiencies in quality control and concerns regarding the test results. Although Chiron's retesting of the unaffected lots of vaccine has been negative for contamination, FDA has determined that it cannot adequately assure the sterility of these lots to our safety standards.

http://www.fda.gov/oc/opacom/hottopics/chronology1016.html

and also
http://www.mhra.gov.uk/news/2004/chironfluvaccine.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
21. "Regulation" - because many business people are too damned ...
Edited on Thu Oct-21-04 12:42 PM by TahitiNut
... stupid or greedy to do things correctly without them!

This is a prime example. The industry has minimal regulation, mostly to ensure that the corruption of greed and ignorance that leads to faulty processes and products does not result in "unacceptable" harm to the public. One of the major problems with our capitalist culture is that our definition of "unacceptable" is getting weaker and weaker. People, especially on the right, are getting more and more willing to sacrifice innocent lives for the sake of the almighty buck and the greater enrichment of the already-wealthy. In business, it's called "externalization" - shifting the costs of corporatism to the general public. Corporations avoid costs and increasingly damage 'society' (their evil clone of socialism, "corporate socialism," the fraternal twin of national socialism).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
22. the result of the bush* de-regulation pogrom....it KILLS people !

under Clinton....there were sufficient qualified CHEMISTS, who reviewed chemical data submitted by drug companies, chemical companies, and environmental clean-up companies....

today, these CHEMISTS have all been pushed aside, there is NO regulation at all....

in Clinton's regulatory environment, this contamination would have been found and FIXED many many months ago...it's insane to continue to operate a contaminated production operation....50 MILLION doses are contaminated....

50 MILLION contaminated doses....that's crazy...it's like building a car with major defects, and then continuing to build defective cars even after you KNOW the cars are defective....and people DIE...

this is exactly what happens in a TOTALLY de-regulated environment, which is what bush* has created....and it should be of HUGE concern to anyone buying pharmaceutical drugs from THESE SAME DEREGULATED COMPANIES.....(notice that it was a FRENCH company that made a fine vaccine...NO contamination....good French regulatory oversight...that's what we need here).....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC