Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Have you seen this months Popular Mechanics Cover? WTF?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:22 PM
Original message
Have you seen this months Popular Mechanics Cover? WTF?
I saw this at the Grocery store today and, as someone that grew up as a flying Model Rocket Hobbyist thought, "Oh, Cool," but when I looked closer, I soon realized, that's NOT a Model, that's a Medium Range Air-to-Air, Anti-Aircraft AIM-120C Missile. That's NOT Cool.:wtf:

<>

I haven't read the article yet, to see if it says HOW and Why this guy has the latest generation Air-to-Air missile (which has also been tested as a Surface-to-Air Missile), but I have written Popular Mechanics to ask them WTF. Does anyone have anymore info about this, or this guy?

Here is a link to a page with data on this Missile:

<http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/missile/aim-120.htm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Someone needs to photoshop in "phallic compensations" for the byline (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrustingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. may as well put a shoot hole at the end.
those men look 'gay', don't they, admiring the big schlong. Where's all the vagina shaped missiles?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's probably a non-functional model n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. No, that's the claim of the article, that they FLY these "Rockets"
with the same fuel as the Space Shuttle. That means, Solid Rocket fuel, which, even without the guidance system, could be a danger to Commercial Jets! :crazy: Granted, it would be a lucky shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
34. Lucky shot is putting it mildly.
There is a reason anti-aircraft missiles have to have very advanced guidance systems. Hitting a flying target is HARD. WWII aircraft used multiple machine guns with very high rates of fire, using hundreds of bullets just trying to get a CHANCE of a hit.

A missile or rocket is like one, single bullet. Without guidance, it doesn't stand a chance.

There's just no threat here. I can easily think of 20 things that could do more harm, and have far better chances of success.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tech3149 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. High Powered Model Rocketry has been big
since the mid 80's. Launches require FAA notification and waivers.

http://www.nar.org/cabinet/index.shtml#faawaiver
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinonedown Donating Member (329 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. So, what, this offends you?
It's Popular Mechanics, not Cosmopolitan. Almost expected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Oh, so you see no problem with a the average guy having ...
...an Anti-Aircraft Missile with a 20+ mile range? I bet some of the active terrorists, who ARE in this country, might want to find this guy. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. kinda not true
the motor for that model has a burn time of about 5 seconds, depending on weight it will go about 5000 feet. Don't let the BTF and the patriot act disciples sway you, this is a great hobby that is under attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
4.  Popular Mechanics and Popular Science should be renamed
" Popular Waste Paper "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. why do you hate us for our freedoms?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. I fly those and
Edited on Wed Mar-16-05 07:34 PM by MichaelHarris
it's a replica, I've built a ton of them. I have some bigger ones but the patriot act killed the hobby bad. So much for rocket physics demonstations for school kids.

It is solid fuel, kinda like the shuttle but there is about 1/gazillion less in hobby rockets. It's been around since 1957 and has had no serious accidents. If you're interested watch October Sky, it's a true story and a pretty good movie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Are you sure? This one has, what looks like, guidance fins up front.
It also looks like its made of Metal, which I thought was Illegal.

I does say AIM-120C on it, but I know decals can be made:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. the kit comes with
those decals, the fiberglass over the cardboard can be sanded to a high polish. If the wind dies down I'll take a picture of the one I'll never get to launch because of the patriot act.

Here's one of mine from it's last launch:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carmerian Donating Member (203 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. Heh
LOC Precision must still be in business :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. LOL yeah
that's their Warlock, it flies great and the kids love to see it because it's kinda big.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. Are you sure this isn't a full-size model rocket...
designed to look like the real thing?

Perhaps we've gone beyond building fallout shelters (ca1950s) to building missile silos in our backyards? Moving from a reactive to proactive home defense? Freepers might think that if we all had a missile in our backyard ready to fire, that the "axis of evil" would think twice before launching a nuclear attack...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. it's
actually a cardboard tube, fiberglassed. The whole thing is nothing more than cardboard tube and plywood. The rules of both the NRA and Tripoli, the governing bodies state the tubes not be of a metal material. There are a few guys making metal ones but they are doing experimental stuff way out in the desert. it's a very safe hobby that the patriot act killed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. ...and in Texas, they'll pass a law that you have to own one. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carmerian Donating Member (203 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. Funny you mention it
I used to be a member of DARS several years ago, and the group's main high-ceiling launch site was just south of where Busholini's pig farm is now. It seems DARS still launches from there, somehow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carmerian Donating Member (203 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
14. Before everyone goes ballistic (so to speak)
As others have noted, the story appears to be about high-power model rocketry. That is, "high-powered" compared with the tiny Estes/Centuri rockets you may have flown as a kid. These larger rockets have only enough fuel for a few seconds of burning, and mostly they're just empty space. Tripoli's website is probably a good place to start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
17. cowboy! conceal that weapon!!
are we sure it's not a viagra ad that got photoshopped?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
18. I won't get into any kind of flame war but
This is a great hobby under attack by the patriot act and the BTF, hundreds of thousands of kids participate and learn physics all over the world thanks to this hobby. Some may see it as men with big "phallic" symbols, some may see it as "militia" guys with big toys, and some may see "terrorist" possiblilities. You all have the right to your opinion but opinions are more effective with facts. I've never once seen any of the above mentioned types at any of the hundreds of launches I've attended. There has NEVER been any evidence made public, (BTF claims evidence but refuses a court order to introduce it into court) that terrorists will use it.

I've been into this hobby for over 20 years and there are some good people involved, too bad fear will will dictate it's death. All I can ask is the people opposed to this hobby read a few web sites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Oh, I fly model rockets. But a life sized replica of a Surface-To-Air...
missile is a little over the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jesus Saves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. The salient word here is 'replica'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carmerian Donating Member (203 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Hybrids
Have you tried flying hybrids? The way things are going, that's going to be the only way to fly large models. They make a nice noise, at any rate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I almost got into that
but I saw too many guys spending way too much time getting it to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carmerian Donating Member (203 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Understandable
My activity was tapering off just about the time that Hypertek's system was coming into use. I'm sure it's nice not to have to worry about buying your reloads at the launch site or getting an LEUP to keep them at home. Carting around those heavy nitrous and liquid nitrogen bottles doesn't look to be fun, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. I had my level 2 cert rocket
ready to go when the patriot act came around, that pretty much killed that. I still have it in case the laws get relaxed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. O.K. now you have me curious, do you have a link to these Hybrids?
Like I said at the beginning, I did fly the small model rockets when I was a kid.:hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. here is some info
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 08:15 PM
Original message
here is a great manufacturer of scale kits
https://secure.consumersinterest.com/pml/

Some people take the scale kits and "upscale" them. That kit in your post may have been an upscaled AmRaam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carmerian Donating Member (203 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. Hybrid links
Edited on Wed Mar-16-05 08:16 PM by Carmerian
Here's Hypertek's page, and here is Aerotech's page (follow the links about reloadable motors).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. I hope your right, it sure looked like the real thing in PM
If nothing else, it's a poorly written article for not having obvious warning notices.

Do you know if they ever flew that "Mercury Redstone" 1/3 Scale Replica successfully?:hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. I think
they flew that on the Discovery channel. For a while last summer the Discovery channel had a series on hobby rocketry. The rules and the launches are very strict on not having guidance. We have electronics i.e. cameras and altimeters for parachute deployment so we don't have to chase them for like 2 million miles. It's actually pretty cool, I have an altimeter set to deploy a small drone chute up high so it falls relatively close to me then at 200 feet a large chute opens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Yeah, I saw that show, but the time I saw it, I don't think it...
...ever got off the pad.:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
26. Plus, without guidance systems, it's zero threat.
First, it's not a surplus missile. It's a carboard, plywood and fiberglass replica. Second, while it and Aim-120s and the shuttle may all be powered by solid fuels, the quantities involved cannnot even be closely compared. I'ts like comparing a firecracker to a crate of dynamite to a 20,000lb Daisy Cutter. Many orders of magnatudes of difference.

Second, without the engine power of an Aim-120, you can't carry the payload (ie: warhead) of an Aim-120.

Lastly, without an advanced tracking system, either using infra-red or radar sensing, your chances of hitting a target with this is practically non-existant. And if you COULD get a tracking system, your weak motor won't be able to lift it very far. And if you add some kind of warhead you aren't even going to get off the ground.

Now, for Gods sake, chill, and let some rocket hobbiests have a some fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meisje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
36. That's why it's called "MODEL ROCKETRY"
It's a model of the rocket
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. I guess, They sure have come a long way since my "Groove Tube"
Now THAT was a Cool little rocket.:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Memories...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
40. The small one is a V-2 rocket model...
are they preparing to strike blue states?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC