Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DOH! Redacted documents (US navy memo)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 11:42 PM
Original message
DOH! Redacted documents (US navy memo)
From: Chief of Naval Operations

To: FOIA Distribution List

Subj: FOIA POLICY RE REDACTION TECHNIQUES

1. The following was passed to this office by the Department of Defense FOIA Office and is forwarded for your immediate action and implementation:

“Recently, redacted documents were placed on a non-FOIA DoD website, and with the use of apparently unsophisticated methods the redacted portions were electronically reinserted into the text of the documents resulting in the comprise of the information that was intended to be denied public release. Although this latest incident was not a FOIA release, previous similar compromises of redacted documents have occurred through FOIA releases. Because of technological means that defeat many old redaction methods, the following guidance is distributed concerning redaction methods that are acceptable to use in the processing of FOIA requests:

*
The preferred DoD method of redacting information denied in association with FOIA requests is a modern software redaction system. These systems are specifically designed to defeat any electronic attempt to reinstall redacted information.



*
The following electronic redaction method is not to be used under any circumstances for FOIA requests: Word processing functions. Redactions made using these readily available resources are easily restored.



*
The following physical redaction techniques are not to be used under any circumstances for FOIA requests: “Black out” methods using magic markers or grease pencils. These methods of covering up information not intended for public release are easily defeated using modern electronic devices.



*
Other physical redaction methods such the use of redaction tape, redaction markers, paper overlay, and liquid paper are not recommend to be used. Although some specific makes of these kinds of products will resist efforts to restore redactions, the possibility of confusion with similar products that will not properly mask deletions is not worth the risk of an unintended release.



*
The acceptable way of physical excising remains the use of an Exacto knife or scissors to cut out the material to be deleted. “



2. Pending the approval of REDAX, this office has routinely uses Post-it Labeling and Cover-Up Tape. We simply cover the information we wish to withhold, bracket the amount of information being withheld, and insert the FOIA exemption. Then the document is copied and the copied version provided to the requester.

3. Because redacted material is made publicly available through means other than the FOIA, please forward this information concerning proper redaction techniques as applicable to public affairs officers, web security specialists, or other personnel within your organizations that make such releases.

4. As you are aware, we are seeking approval by NMCI for the use of REDAX, an electronic redaction software. Some of you have indicated a desire to use this software. Once approval is granted, we will disseminate information regarding cost, installation, and training.

5. This document is posted at www.foia.navy.mil under Resource Materials (FOIA Policy).


DORIS M. LAMA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC