Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, the White House is expressing indignation over the Newsweek story.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 12:29 PM
Original message
So, the White House is expressing indignation over the Newsweek story.
As per Scott McClellan's briefing this morning in which he expressed that "sorry" isn't good enough

I think the real issue is that the story SOUNDS quite credible, considering the administration's past performance.

If someone reported ten years ago that military interrogators flushed a Quran in a toilet, further research would have been warranted.

In light of recent revelations concerning Buxh administration atrocities against the Muslim world, the accusations seem very credible.

George Buxh's hard earned reputation precludes his right to indignation in this matter.

In fact, Because of past bullying by the admin against their detractors, I still have suspicions of why the "source" changed his story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
UdoKier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Koran story was true. The retraction is false.
Bush. McClellan & Rove: "Stop printing the truth, dammit!"

Newsweek: "Okay."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They haven't retracted the story, that is a distortion being put
out by the rightwingers and the inept media.

From an article in Canadian news:

"But despite the apology, Newsweek editor Mark Whitaker defended his staff in an interview. He insisted Newsweek did nothing "professionally wrong," that nobody would be disciplined over the report, and that no retraction would be made."

Link to the article:

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/1116238425043_30/?hub=TopStories



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. But this is how it works -
Edited on Mon May-16-05 12:40 PM by Skip Intro
Discredit the media by feigning outrage so that the story becomes the media itself, and the original news is obscured. This serves to both intimidate an already whorish media and taint the media in the eyes of the flock who still buy the crap from the regime.

If the UK memo story ever gets traction in our MSM (another memo, I'm sure they'll be all over it anytime now), you can bet the defense from the traitors in the WH won't be a refutation of the memo itself, but an attack on a "liberal" media that's "already got it wrong twice." That attack would be relentless, for as long as it took to obscure the truth, and the public to lose interest.

And I don't doubt for a minute that the Newsweek source was "silenced" by the thugs who gave us the Iraq massacre, Gitmo, and Abu Garaib - to name a few.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. What an arrogant bunch of twits. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC