|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
ailsagirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 07:46 PM Original message |
Chimp's approval rating down to 43% !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xray s (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
1. Ha! 43 for 43! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UCLA Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
2. hopefully it will keep going that direction and take the congress with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The_Casual_Observer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
3. Not around these parts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 07:50 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. My condolences to your parts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BattyDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
4. Uh-Oh! Looks like it's time for a new Bin Laden video! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 07:50 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 07:52 PM Original message |
Watch for another "Number 3 operative" to be captured tomorrow... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meti57b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 09:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
20. It's probably what this Newsweek thing is for. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blue neen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
7. That means his disapproval rating is 57%. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 07:53 PM Original message |
Or even better: "Nearly 60 percent disapprove of Bush" nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blue neen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
14. Yeah, that's the way to say it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 09:49 PM Response to Original message |
23. And THAT is almost 2/3. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ultraist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 09:55 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. A Democrat is going to win the Presidency in 08!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ultraist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 09:55 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. sorry dupe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rzemanfl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 07:55 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. No, seven percent are "undecided" or something. They all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blue neen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 09:25 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. I'll take those undecided as disapprovals! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 09:48 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. Remember--You're with him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rzemanfl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-17-05 06:22 PM Response to Reply #15 |
40. I personally think that a small percentage of people say they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atlas Mugged (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
8. Still not low enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-17-05 08:16 PM Response to Reply #8 |
42. Well, imagine what it REALLY is, without all the rigged polling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinfoilinfor2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-17-05 08:43 PM Response to Reply #8 |
43. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HawkerHurricane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
9. Take cover! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gademocrat7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
10. How low can it go? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paparush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
12. Expect Karl to set off a large explosion soon... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moobu2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
13. It's hard to fathom why his approval numbers are so high n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ailsagirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
16. Interesting... 35% "Don't know" WTF?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-17-05 09:08 PM Response to Reply #16 |
44. Oh, I know. The "undecideds" on that issue are INSANE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
17. But-Rush!, But-Rush! 43% Didn't Count When CLINTON Won! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
18. CNN was whoring some poll today that showed Chimp's approval numbers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
19. Deleted message |
ultraist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 09:52 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. No, it's not a moot point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 10:01 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. Deleted message |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 10:08 PM Response to Reply #29 |
36. ??? where is the logical consistency in that? And why are you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 10:09 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Deleted message |
jazzjunkysue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
21. 4....3....2.....1.....RED ALERT!! Grab the tin foil! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
25. 43 points of idiot to go, 43 points of idiot... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
28. isn't the lowest 16 percent approval for Nixon ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Disturbed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 10:06 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. When mentioning PNAC please... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
30. Considering the bang-up job he's done, it should be 4.3% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VOX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
31. May it flatline. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thecai (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 10:04 PM Response to Original message |
32. Still That High? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
carpetbagger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
34. I predict 65% by fall 2006. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Festivito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-17-05 06:22 AM Response to Reply #34 |
39. Or, the opponent's approval will be even less. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
35. Sure it's not turdy tree and a turd? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nittygritty (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-05 10:11 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. LOL!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-17-05 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
41. Just FYI, lowest approval rating ever was Carter (20%). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC