Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Newsweek Could Have Said

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Plaid Adder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 01:12 PM
Original message
What Newsweek Could Have Said
Edited on Tue May-17-05 01:19 PM by Plaid Adder
OK, I'm a little better now.

Here's what, if they could collectively come up with a pair, Newsweek could have said in answer to Scotty, Rummy, and Condi:

Dear Friends,

The information that there was an investigation going on into the trashing of the Koran at Guantanamo Bay was passed on to us by a source working in your administration. We checked this out with other administration sources before running the piece. Nobody we talked to took issue with it. Now that the piece has attracted negative attention from you and your colleagues, our original source has decided to change his story. We regret having relied on a source who was either being dishonest with us, or has now proven susceptible to your intimidation. We also regret having assumed that our administration sources would be honest with us, instead of waiting until the piece came out to attack it. That is all we regret.

In answer to Mr. McClellan's complaint that this is "not enough," we have this to say: We do not work for you. We work for the truth, and we work for the American people. Keeping you happy is not our job. Nor are we responsible for making the world love the Bush administration. If you don't like the way America is viewed in the Muslim world or indeed the world in general, then perhaps you should reconsider the way your administration treats the rest of the world. Frankly, it does not matter how much rose-colored propaganda we generate about America if your policies are giving the lie to it every day.

In another time, under another administration, we might have considered reports that American soldiers humiliated Muslim captives by trashing their holy book so outlandish as to be unworthy even of investigation. Under this administration, unfortunately, no report of depravity can now be dismissed out of hand as incredible. We will continue our efforts to discover just what in the world is really going on down at America's most impenetrable prison camp, and whenever we find something, we will continue to publish it, whether or not it reflects favorably on you.

Nobody has ever perished from too much self-awareness. It will not hurt this country to know what it is currently being made of. We look forward to playing a role in improving world opinion of our beloved country--not by lying about what it is now, but by telling the truth in order that eventually, it may become better.

Sincerely,

The Newsweek Editorial Staff

Yeah, right,

The Plaid Adder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Plaid Adder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. See, without the profanity, it's just not the same. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Not the same but...
Without the profanity it doesn't get across the sense of outrage that you and I feel.

However, this version is something they could actually have said if they had a pair and were real journalists. In a way, this plausible would-be response from them rubs their noses in their own shit even more effectively because this is just what they should have said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. I love you
I don't even know you but I love you! And I nominated this fantastic post :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. OH if only they had!
They would have shown they are working on behalf of the American public as real journalists would instead of making themselves even more irrelevant.

Excellent post, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paula777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Brilliant - I would have been happy if they said HALF of that
instead they fell on the sword - like everyone else seems to do. Like the fucking mob this administration ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. That is bloody brilliant!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. Or, alternately:
Dear assholes,

Get real! These riots aren't due to our article, you lying sacks of shit. Gen. Myers himself said they were more about the political situation in Afghanistan.

If you weren't all dumb as rocks, you'd realize that if people there aren't going to riot over prisoners of war dying in our custody, or being tortured and photographed to memorialize their humiliation, they're certainly not going to riot on account of some soldier flushing the Quran down the toilet.

We in the media are very aware that you'd like everyone to ignore the Downing Street Memo, and your attempt to distract everyone has worked well for a few days.

Now, back to business...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enraged_Ape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. That's terrific
Unfortunately, it assumes a dreamworld where the American media has any credibility or integrity whatsoever. It's just so sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. IF ONLY,...
,...that were the response!!! If only!!!!

Maybe, YOU should be an editor-in-chief!!! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
10. They also could have said:
"Donald Rumsfeld is lecturing on lying and the value of human life? You're kidding, right?"

"UK Memo! UK memo! UK Memo! UK Memo!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 05:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. Kick!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
12. You should send this to Newsweek!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC