Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rush was claiming that Plame hadn't

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JohnnyBoots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:35 PM
Original message
Rush was claiming that Plame hadn't
been active in nine years, any basis in fact. He sounded scared in an angry way. How seriously does your average American take this guy? Must need pain pills to carry around an ego that big.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rush lies habitually...
...and it's sad. He just pulls shit out of his ass, and his mealy minded mouth-breathing dittoheads chew on his shit like it were the gospel. Problem is, if she wasn't active, why the investigation? Why did Bush say that the leak was a serious crime and the perp would be fired? Is Rush saying Bush was lying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Rush Isn't Pulling It Outta His Ass.He's Regurgitating RNC Talking Points
just a quibble. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihaveaquestion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Don't you mean "Rush lies pathologically"
At this point, I don't think he's even able to tell the truth. No wonder he can't stay married......

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Donovan McNabb
I'm not an Eagles fan (GO JETS!), but wasnt it great to see McNabb leading them to the SuperBowl last year. I could see big Rush with potato chips all over his lap and face watching the SuperBowl clutching his pills in the other hand. When New England scored, he probably popped a pill and garbled..."see I told you so", all the while spewing chips from his mouth,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyBoots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Amen, I am an Eagles fan and I was really hoping
when Rush said all that stuff that one Don's fellow Eagles would have slipped him copy of "Rush Limbaugh is a Big, Fat Idiot" just for laughs. Herm Edwards is an ex Eagle so I root for the Jets if they are on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. She was U-N-D-E-R-C-O-V-E-R. why would she make it known what she
Edited on Tue Jul-12-05 01:38 PM by bushisanidiot
was doing, when and where she was doing it?

that boilass draft dodger has no clue what he's talking about.

He should SHUT THE HELL UP AND SIT THE HELL DOWN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Doesn't matter anyways
It doesn't matter if she wasn't active for 50 years.

She was STILL a covert CIA operative.

The law is clear, Rush. There are no exemptions. Expose a covert operative and a federal crime has been committed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kilroy003 Donating Member (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. The law states that the operative must have been
undercover, outside of the country, within the last five years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyBoots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. was she?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kilroy003 Donating Member (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I dunno...
...Probably not if she was working at Langley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Really? Do you know where to find the wording of the law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kilroy003 Donating Member (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. No. It was part of an article on the subject.
Edited on Tue Jul-12-05 02:09 PM by Kilroy003
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kilroy003 Donating Member (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. I think this is it. Though I haven't read any of it myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Thanks. I don't see any mention of a 5 year limitation, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. Citation, please.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kilroy003 Donating Member (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Check out this article...
"A prosecutor seeking to establish a violation of the law has to establish an intentional disclosure by someone with authorized access to classified information. That person must know that the disclosure identifies a covert agent "and that the United States was taking affirmative measures to conceal such covert agent's intelligence relationship to the United States." A covert agent is defined as someone whose identity is classified and who has served outside the United States within the last five years."


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/12/politics/12cnd-rove.html?pagewanted=3&ei=5094&en=58863f7c28b3a331&hp&ex=1121227200&partner=homepage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chipper Chat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. And where does El-Rushbo get his information?
Could it be the Rove-Gannon pipeline?????
G*A*S*P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. The rw taking points are dictating questions about Plame's value
as a "desk job" worker. They are all saying the same thing right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. and 10million sheep now believe that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. His show should have a disclaimer.
"The views and comments made by Mr. Limbaugh are in accordance with the Bush Republican Party and should not be considered impartial or objective observations of a nuetral commentator."

Just in case anyone might think that Rush has no stake in this fight.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. rush
Once CIA always CIA

They are now trying to discredit the victim here,
something they always do, to take the spotlight away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. I need pain pills after I listen to him. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. Doesn't matter. Even if so, people who worked with her were
still in the field and now at risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. And Fitzgerald Doesn't Know That?!?!?
This is so pathetic. Does this idiot really think that a big-time, hot track record prosecutor like Fitzgerald wouldn't know that there was no possibility of a crime committed? Fitzgerald would have been done with this investigation months and months ago if there had been no crime. He would have found that out in the first month, and then said "Investigation over. No criminal activity occurred."

The reason an expert like Fitzgerald didn't say that, is that he must know some crime took place. Even a simpleton like Rush should be able to figure that out. Well, maybe not.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plcdude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
18. he just makes things up
most of the time. Here is how he operates. He listens to what Democrats, Liberals, Progressives, or Moderates (which he lumps together) are saying about the administration and its ilk and immediately applies it to the "liberals". The Libs are desparate, single issue, same old playbook etc. type speech. He bounces each criticism back and it is laughable. I believe he is currently trying to blame the NY Times for the whole mess by speculating that J. Miller's contact was someone other than Rove. He is becoming more and more out of sync with reality and saying things that are sometimes just off the wall. I would guess he is doing his best to support * because he is going to need that pardon sometime in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
22. And Rump Leakage would know this how? Oh yes he was an unpaid advisor to
Bush during the campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
23. She may have been one of the most important NOCs the CIA had.
Edited on Tue Jul-12-05 01:57 PM by Quixote1818

>>>According to additional sources interviewed by Wayne Madsen, Brewster Jennings was, in fact, a well-established CIA proprietary company, linked for many years to ARAMCO. The demise of Brewster Jennings was also guaranteed the moment Plame was outed.

It takes years for Non-Official Covers or NOCs, as they are known, to become really effective. Over time, they become gradually more trusted; they work their way into deeper information access from more sensitive sources. NOCs are generally regarded in the community as among the best and most valuable of all CIA operations officers and the agency goes to great lengths to protect them in what are frequently very risky missions.


By definition, Valerie Plame was an NOC. Yet unlike all other NOCs who fear exposure and torture or death from hostile governments and individual targets who have been judged threats to the United States, she got done in by her own President, whom we also judge to be a domestic enemy of the United States.

Moreover, as we will see below, Valerie Plame may have been one of the most important NOCs the CIA had in the current climate. Let's look at just how valuable she was.


http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/060804_coup_detat.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
insane_cratic_gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
24. So by the same token he's saying
It only matters if she was on assignment in the middle of danger at the moment it was leaked?

Ok Rush is notorious for taking a piece of information and twisting it to show his side of an argument.

What if it had been a Dem who exposed Plame's identity? We know the answer to that. They'd be hung at sunrise weeks ago.

Or what if Rove outed a Seal on their present location? Would that be enough?

Lets be honest. We are talking about people who are Ok with Killing innocent Iraqis. Who are ok with US invading a Sovereign country based on LIES. They are ok with American soldiers acting like deadly Frat boys because the prisoners are fed a chicken dinner with pears. They are ok with BushINC being appointed president rather then elected. They are ok with degrading their rights as American civilians based on lies. They believe the entire media is Liberal.*cough bullshit* They've bought and sold the lies so many times, they no longer know the truth.

It's sad really.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
25. The CIA has already made a determination that a crime,...
,...may have been committed and referred it for investigation.

Rush doesn't know wtf he's talking about. He's just a blow-hard bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC