Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Information on Plame in memo was extra-Top Secret

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 07:36 PM
Original message
Information on Plame in memo was extra-Top Secret
Edited on Thu Jul-21-05 07:44 PM by geek tragedy
Per Keith Olbermann and John Harwood from the WSJ:

Memo was classified as Top Secret!

Plame section had special designation TS: NSF--Top Secret: Do not Share with Foreign Nationals
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. WSJ?!?!?! This story gets weirder and weirder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They're the ones who broke the memo story earlier.
NSF is a big time super secret designation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Losing track of the twists and turns of this thing
I just know that the WSJ is one of the biggest enablers of the criminal cabal in charge of the government. Worse than the Moonie Times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonicx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. i disagree. Moonie Times is worse...
In addition to their wingnut columnists, their reporting sucks and clearly bias most of the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Hard to distinguish on the editorial page
I remember the editor being interviewed after Enron crashed and he was asked about corruption in corporate management. He attributed the fall of Enron to the 'business cycle'..
:eyes:

It doesn't get much worse than that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. While the WSJ editorial board (and page) is very conservative...
...the rest of the paper is very even-handed, and some of the best reporting you'll find in a mainstream paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Used to subscribe until they started trying a coup d'etat with Clinton
over a blow job.

The editorial board is like the Moonie Times. They must be freaking out over the WSJ reporters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueWolff Donating Member (337 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Rove is BURNT TOAST LMAO
It is happening friends....The Chimps brain is going down...where and how we don't know...but he is going down!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. he'll still run his dirtly work for bush from wherever he lives
but his stench is permeating the entire bush operation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. how about for a penetary for 10 years?? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I LIKE YO' STYLE FLYARM
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Yes, the editors exonerated Rove last week.
And now the lackeys are taking a turn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NancyG Donating Member (483 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. It's true that the rest of WSJ people are not conservative
On a cross-country Amtrak trip, I was seated in the dining car with an editor from the WSJ. I asked the same question about the conservative leanings of the paper. He said that it was only the editorial staff and the rest of the paper was quite liberal. He was, for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. This is more than Plame this is Brewster & Jennings all the way!!!
Rove and Libby are so cooked and so are their Bosses!!!

Bush was there with all of them!!!

I'm betting on Colin Powell squeeling!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes2000 Donating Member (481 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Yes, we cannot forget Brewster & Jennings. It's the knockout punch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. Powell has a bone to pick with Cheney & Rumsfeld.
The fight is going to spillover on Bush...Bolton was another Powell shot across the bow when Powell spoke to Voinovich privately regarding how awful Bolton was. Powell knew directly it was a Cheney appointment.

Pottery Barn Rules are back in play...
It doesn't absolve Powell of his UN performance, but hey let the elephants trample each other! They have to clean it up!

Powell to cheney: How do ya like me NOW...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
15. Ok, there is no "Extra" Top Secret
and no NSF. It was either S/NF or TS/NF. (NF usually pronounced NOFORN)

This Extra Top Secret is like getting information on "super double secret background."

I don't blame the OP, I blame KO and his guest who were happily butchering acronyms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
18. Plame and Brewster, Jennings & Assoc were TOPS at fighting WMDs.
From what I've read and heard:

Cheney and Turd Blossom believed destroying Wilson's wife would put an end to the bureaucracy's opposition to their insane work. They were wrong. There are too many good people in government, officials with INTEGRITY.

Plame and her network worked to stop the spread of nukes out of the former Soviet Republics. She, working undercover for the brass plate company BJ&A developed a network of contacts and agents working in Europe, Africa and Asia.

Blowing her cover blew up the network and endangered the lives of all involved, as well as most anyone who came in contact with her and the company in the many nations they did "business." Gee. It was about as important an assignment as there is -- tracking the spread and stopping the flow of WMDs.

Perhaps if there's a trial, they'll beg for mercy: "I didn't know she was a CIA agent." In front of an honest judge or jury, it won't matter. Outting Plame and her Org severely damaged the national security of the United States.

Bad news for Rove and Cheney and Bush, too. Great news for the country. It's good to out TRAITORS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC