|
Edited on Mon Jul-25-05 03:08 PM by stuckinlucky
I work in the Provost's Office of a medium-sized arts and media college, and my boss (The Provost) has asked me to come up with some ideas about the federally mandated "Constitution and Citizenship Day" on September 17th. Byrd inserted language into an appropriations act earlier this year requiring college's to do this, but the bill gives significant latitude. I've come up with a few ideas, but I'd be interested in hearing what DUer's have to say.
The ideas probably shouldn't be overtly political, but when the subject is the Constitution, politics can't be avoided entirely.
One angle I've been considering is an examination of how and why we limit the freedoms guaranteed in the Constitution. For example: the classic "fire in a crowded theatre" is considered an appropriate limitation on free speech. What are some other areas in which the government enforces appropriate limitations on constitutional rights and (more importantly) how do we determine when limitations cross the line?
Another idea is to examine the question of whether the rights and freedoms in the constitution are limited to Americans, or are they universal human rights and freedoms. This question is particularly important in light of the abuses under the Patriot Act - We are currently holding people without trials, public presentation of evidence, legal representation, etc. and justifying it in part because they aren't Americans. Does pure accident of birth negate an individual's rights?
The whole idea is to engage the campus (faculty and students) in a discourse on the Constitution and what it means to a free society. Questions are more important than answers.
These are just a few of mine, what are some of yours?
|