Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary Clinton voted NO on Byrd's amendment today. Why?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 03:50 PM
Original message
Hillary Clinton voted NO on Byrd's amendment today. Why?
Anybody understands this?
Biden also voted no.
Byrd wanted to hold the approval of 17b until an explanation is given on how the money is going to be spent ($50 thousand trucks?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
diplomats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who else voted no among the Dems?
Maybe it was a procedural thing??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Bayh (sp?) and perhaps others I missed
But Hillary stuck out like a sore thumb to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. We need a list to go with who voted for the War powers act.
Need to carry it to the polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJerseyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
27. Nelson of Nebraska
I believe I heard his name. No suprise there. I would assume that Zell Miller also voted no but he doesn't show up for a lot of votes so he may have not been there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. DLC types

they belong to the corporate money class not the
working class

just another big give away to corporate power
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gringo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hillary is an opportunistic, self-serving,
former Goldwater girl, bitch who has supported the Bush agenda conssistently, especially RE the war. It's funny that wingnuts think she's such a liberal. I defend her from their demented attacks, but I don't like her much either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diplomats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Supported the Bush agenda consistently?
Other than her vote on the Iraq resolution, she has virtually never sided with Bush. What are you talking about??? BTW, you're no better than Rush in calling her a bitch. I find that word very offensive. Who cares if she was a Goldwater girl 40 years ago?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
33. Uh, I voted for Goldwater in 63, when I turned 21. I was callow and
foolish, and thought he was 'cool' because I had chatted with him on ham radio. I regret the vote but I don't think he was a bad person generally. People change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. She's the distinguished Senator from New York.
Can't afford even the perception of being soft on "terrorism" there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. Soft on terrorism IS exactly what shes doing -
By allowing bullies to continue to get what they want, WE WILL CONTINUE TO REAP THE CONSEQUENCES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. exactly, but the previous poster is probably on the right
track. Neocons unfortunately still have cashe as being tough on terrorist instead of their reality which is that they provocatours of terrorism.

People are slowly waking up to this, but the Democratic establishment wisdom changes about as quickly as the vatican changes coarse on birth control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. link?
Or did it just happen?

Use the Senate Watch thread folks, it's there for a reason....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. They don't want to question why we should spend $33,000 each for
pickup trucks that cost $14,000. Landrieu was a slug too. And Biden did just what I said he would do in another thread. "Oh, I'm gonna criticize the administration, then just CAVE when it comes right down to it."

Oh, and Iraq really needs zip codes, whose planning costs millions of $$.

THIS MAKES ME SICK. I was never really fond of Hillary before, but not questioning the administration about their PLAN for Iraq and the money that is going to contractors, THIS SMELLS TO HIGH HEAVEN!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. On top of that they strip all safty items out when they sell them
to those countries. I know, when I lived their we used a GMC and not a safty item in it. Doors left safe and the whole works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. I don't know, can you post a link to the text of the ammendment?
Seriously, how the hell am I supposed to know without reading it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. bYRD JUST INTRODUCED IT THIS am.
Split the $87 BILLION "emergency" appropriations bill for Iraq/Afghanistan into two bills.(Defeated, 38 to 59.)The troops support bill would have been passed right away.The Other 21 Billion bill was to be Iraqi reconstruction, about which a lot of people had questions, and Byrd thought needed more hearings and didn't need to be voted on for a couple of months.

Contracts, over-pricing, more high priced execs from the U. S., NO PLAN for Iraqi reconstruction,,,,,a LOT OF QUESTIONS. bUT hILLARY BUNKED. i GUESS SHE LIKES SPENDING OUR TAX MONEY FOR CONTRACTORS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diplomats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Exactly
what the heck was in that thing anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. sorry. I could not find the text. I guess it will be posted tomorrow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
31. It ought to be
I'll try to post it in tomorrow's Senate Watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. Desperately seeking REAL DEMOCRATS
WTF is wrong with this picture?

These mushball Senate Dems like Biden and Clinton are even worse than the GOP, IMHO.

At least with the GOP, we KNOW they're going to be against us. The mushball Dems act like they'll put up a good fight and defend the interests of working people, but when it comes time to cut the nuts, they roll over and play dead so the Rethugs can walk right over them.

Bill Clinton was the same way. He talked the talk, but he NEVER showed any REAL backbone against the Repubs. Keerist, why bother voting for Democrats anymore when the ones we elect end up doing the bidding of the Bush admin anyway?

I say toss them out on their useless asses and elect some REAL Democrats in their places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. Hillary is a centrist, so was Bill
Both have always sold out, imo, when it came to issues like this..Look at their record..
Hillary voted to give Bu$h a blank check before the war..
Ted Kennedy and Byrd are the heroes in all this...any Dem who voted for Bu$h's blank cheque for the war , no matter how hard they try to spin it, are behaving like DINOs then and now.
Republican Lite Dems are all over Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. pffft
I don't know why the Republican wingnuts are so afraid that Hillary is going to run in 2004. After all, she votes with them on issues that are important to Democrats.

The money that's going to be spent on 'reconstruction' (read: Halliburton profits) is obscene. To vote blindly for price gouging and corporate theft paid 100% by the American taxpayers is a disgrace. Hell, even Feinstein voted for the Byrd amendment.

I don't care what procedural objection she had. The amendment wouldn't have passed due to the Republican majority, so she may as well vote her conscience. She voted for her political butt instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diplomats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Anyone know why Biden voted no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. This is not related to Hillary but to the Republicans in the Senate
I had posted this in another thread, and got no reaction. I just want to know if I am overly sensitive to people from other countries, especially those who we invade but:


Bond (Republican from MO) and Gordon Smith (R OR) said the same thing on the Senate floor today:

IRAQ IS LIKE A ROACH MOTEL FOR TERRORISTS!

And they sounded so proud of it.

Why do Americans think that it is GOOD to fight the war on terrorism in another people's country? It is better that they kill all the Iraqis so as they said the terrorists don't come to Missouri?

Why do we value Iraqi lives less than ours?

A roach motel for terrorists... I am TOTALLY OFFENDED!!!!!

I feel so embarrassed with our view of the world!!!
We are happy that the terrorists are killing Iraqis and ruining their country so that they don't ruin ours?
The population was tortured by Saddam, they did not want to go to war.
What is the matter with us that we can say this with a straight face and think it is OK?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dude_CalmDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #18
35. No you're not being overly sensitive - you're absolutely right.
I find it to be disgusting as well. Millions have died in the Congo in the last few years as a result of the civil war and I have not heard a single word about it from CNN, MSRNC or FUX. I've never heard any mention of it from Dan Rather or Peter Jennings. Fuck them right? They are just African babies ripped from their mother’s arms. It's not like they matter. It's not like they even come close to being as important as Laci Peterson.

By the way, I was going to start a thread asking exactly the same question about Hillary. I know she's not the only one who voted with the pukes today but she sticks out to me because so many DUers give her a free ride. In my opinion she's only a liberal when it won't hurt her career.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
19. Somebody post Kerry's, Edwards' and Lieberman's votes.
This is an ELECTION ISSUE. Are we going to let the Bushies get away with excessive profits for contractors, no bid contracts, no others except Bushies getting contracts, no participation by Iraqis,NO CONCRETE PLANS FOR iRAQI RECONSTRUCTION THAT bUSHIES CAN BE HELD TO,,,or are OUR PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES GOING TO REPRESENT US?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I doubt they were in attendance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Edwards was there and he voted yes n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. One brownie point for him.
Maybe two. He's tending to the people's business and trying to make the administration accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Racenut20 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
22. I was a "Goldwater Boy"
Both in the Primary in California against Rockerfeller, and again against Johnson (I knew he was lying about the VN war). And I as well as my family are dedicated Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #22
37. She was 17 or younger when she was a GG.
I imagine most of us have changed an important opinion or two since that age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying_Pig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
28. She voted for the war because she was pressured by AIPAC...
What few realize, is that AIPAC and PNAC, along with the JDL and JINSA, pretty much all work hand in hand. All support the Likud, and Likud's leader Sharon, and all have been banging the drums for invasions of Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lybia, etc., ...all the countries on PNAC's list. I'll bet Feinstein, and several other AIPAC puppies voted against Byrd's bill too. Clinton is yet another AIPAC whore, who is willing to sell her country down the tubes to support Israel.

:grr:
!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wrkclskid Donating Member (579 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
29. Dems who voted against the ammendment
Clinton
Cantwell
Dayton
Miller
Nelson (Nebraska)
Landrieu
Biden
Carper

Surprisingly, Breaux voted for the amendment, Chaffe was the only repub to do so. Honestly, not sure how I feel about this ammendment. I hate to keep dneying funding the Iraqui's may need. The humanitarian in me says we should help them out after destroying their country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. They are not voting no. Byrd wanted to EXAMINE the items
before approving them. The price tags were astronomical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wrkclskid Donating Member (579 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. with certain items
I would be ok with that, and I don;t beleive we should help re-building Mosques, but their are also needs, such as health care and food, that I believe they need the help right away on, if Byrd were to seperate those from his ammendment I may be ok with it. I don't have an objection to building schools in Iraq, I think we should build schools and hosptials both here and their.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. My understanding is
that the Byrd Amendment would have cut Bush's proposed $20.3 billion in U.S. rebuilding aid to Iraq to $5.1 billion. Maybe there will be other amendments. They haven't approved the $87 billion yet.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uslatest/story/0,1282,-3215820,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastDemInIdaho Donating Member (483 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
36. She is running for President
Can't have any unpopular votes on record for now. Sit tight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC