anyone ever hear this about the neocons vis-a-vis the DLC?

[sojourner]

and is this a reliable/respectable source? http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2003/3028neocon_dems.html

[NVMojo]

1. I've read it before. I like his research efforts. He's not an ass kisser.

[LittleClarkie]

2. FUCK NO!!!

Lyndon LaRouche is cuckoo bananas. Run away. Run far, far, FAR away.

[sojourner]

3. okie dokie then...

is he sorta like Wayne Madsen?

[LittleClarkie]

4. Weirder

His supporters are almost cult-like.

There was some weird theory about Israel and the Queen of England, if I recall correctly.

Wayne looks like Edward R. Morrow, next to this guy.

Here's an article that might give you some idea:
http://www.rickross.com/reference/larouche/larouche5.html

[Warpy]

5. Yeah, but even a stopped clock is right twice a day

and LaRouche was warning about the PNAC Zionists for years before anybody had discovered the PNAC and certainly a long time before Franklin was discovered in Feith's office, about as exalted a post as one can get in the Pentagon, passing everything along to Israel. Nobody in the Bush gang seemed to be particularly concerned about that, which is pretty telling.

That he considers the DLC to be a fifth column of right wing extremists is not a new idea, either, and has been seen on this board many times.

I prefer to think of them as decent but WRONG Eisenhower Repugs, disgusted by Nixon and alarmed by Goldwater, who promised to bring "new blood, new ideas" to the party and counter the Nixonian Southern Strategy.

Well, their new ideas turned out to be rather old ones that have never worked, they ignored the party base, and they lost us all 3 branches of government.

However, I can't really consider them a fifth column, inserted into the party to destroy it from within, even if they've nearly been successful at doing so. I'm not that far gone yet.

[No Exit]

6. Nutty LaRouche aside, it would not surprise me if the neocons had

hedged their bets. I mean, Joe Lieberman is clearly in sympathy with them. And he was on one ticket in 2000, while the neocons' dream team, Bush/Cheney, was on the other. We were, in a sense, screwed.

But... I really don't think Lieberman would've been half as effective (read: bullheaded, vicious, stubborn, determined) for them as is the current stain on the VP's office.

[donheld]

7. I hate your source, but it wouldn't surprise me

Not in the least.

[Avalux]

8. Locking.

larouchepub.com is not a reliable source.