Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Impeach Bush Because...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Peter Frank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 04:22 AM
Original message
Impeach Bush Because...
Please add references & links...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gandalfdf Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
1.  because
He spy's on us and breaks the laws of the constitution
He has an IQ of 96
He was more concerned with his little war than poor people dying in New Orleans

The list could go on forever
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Hi gandalfdf!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. He has gone against every one of the 10 Commandments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. He has gone against every one of the 10 Commandments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBaldyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. Impeach him because you can ....
U.S. constitution: Article 1; Section 3; clauses 6-7
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. thats what the pukes did with The Big Dog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speed8098 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. As much as I can't stand the retard
Edited on Wed Dec-28-05 06:38 AM by Speed8098
Impeachment at this time is not an option.

Imagine it..................President Cheney & Vice President Rice.


No thanks, we're better off with the lame chimp.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Cheney is no more
likely to become president than Spiro Agnew is. The House investigation into the White House policies will lead as much to the Vice President's office as the President's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speed8098 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I respect your opinion
But do you want ANY of the people in line in this administration to become the leader of the free world?

I know I don't.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I think that the
people in this administration lack the ethical requirements to be the leaders of the free world, and hence share your opinion that a congressional action aimed at Bush has some very real risks. I do not think that Cheney gaining power is the primary concern. In fact, I think that he has become something of a ball & chain on the administration, and as much as I think he needs to face legal consequences, I am hoping that the country and congress will not allow his resignation to be the end of the process.

What I am particularly concerned about, and I mentioned it recently in another thread, is that the Constitution is actually vague on the successor to the presidency. I quoted from "Four Days in November," a NYTimes book published in 2003, that had some 600 pages of the NYT's coverage of the JFK assasination. Pages 172-3 present an interesting read on Article II, Section 1, Clause 5. It notes, for example, that "(c)ontrary to popular notion, the Constitution does not specifically state that the vice president shall become president in the event of the president's death." In fact, the 83 words have created a Constitutional custom, but are open to serious debate by attorneys .... and as we saw in Florida in 2000, there is a group grasping power in this nation that has no respect for laws, state or federal, and no sense of duty to that Constitution.

Thus, while there is a 1947 law about who is next in line, my concern is less about Cheney than about an entrenched administration refusing to respect the law of the land -- the executive branch shows utter contempt for the congress and has prostituted the courts. I think that is a very real risk .... and much like a surgery to remove a cancerous tumor has very real risks, the decision not to operate may actually be worse.

2006 is going to be a strange year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dutchdemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. Because
Because Bush is a bawdy, bat-fowling, beslubbering, beef-witted, bootless, beetle-headed, churlish, boil-brained, cockered, clapper-clawed, clouted, clay-brained, craven, common-kissing, currish, crook-pated, dankish, dismal-dreaming, dissembling, dizzy-eyed, droning, doghearted, errant, dread-bolted, fawning, earth-vexing, fobbing, elf-skinned, froward, fat-kidneyed, frothy, fen-sucked, gleeking, flap-mouthed, goatish, fly-bitten, gorbellied, folly-fallen, impertinent, fool-born, infectious, full-gorged, jarring, guts-griping, loggerheaded, half-faced, lumpish, hasty-witted, mammering, hedge-born, mangled, hell-hated, mewling, idle-headed, paunchy, ill-breeding, pribbling, ill-nurtured, puking, knotty-pated, puny, milk-livered, quailing, motley-minded, rank, onion-eyed, reeky, plume-plucked, roguish, pottle-deep, ruttish, pox-marked, saucy, reeling-ripe, spleeny, rough-hewn, spongy, rude-growing, surly, rump-fed, tottering, shard-borne, unmuzzled, sheep-biting, vain, spur-galled, venomed, swag-bellied, villainous, tardy-gaited, warped, tickle-brained, wayward, toad-spotted, weedy, unchin-snouted, yeasty, weather-bitten Moran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC